2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-019-01210-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Low-Level Laser and Light-Emitting Diode Enhance the Stability of Dental Implants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study have concluded that PBMT was applied with 830 nm wavelength and 5 J/cm 2 energy to implants placed in the posterior mandible with a 4 to 4.5 mm diameter and 10 mm length and ISQ values were higher in the PBMT group compared to the control group 30 . Also, PBMT at 830 nm wavelength and additionally LED therapy were applied on the implants placed in the posterior mandible with a 4.8 mm diameter and 10 mm length and it has reported that PBMT application with LED increases primary stabilization 31 . On the contrary, the study was reported that although the ISQ was lower in the posterior region of both maxilla and mandible, the differences were not statistically significant 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A study have concluded that PBMT was applied with 830 nm wavelength and 5 J/cm 2 energy to implants placed in the posterior mandible with a 4 to 4.5 mm diameter and 10 mm length and ISQ values were higher in the PBMT group compared to the control group 30 . Also, PBMT at 830 nm wavelength and additionally LED therapy were applied on the implants placed in the posterior mandible with a 4.8 mm diameter and 10 mm length and it has reported that PBMT application with LED increases primary stabilization 31 . On the contrary, the study was reported that although the ISQ was lower in the posterior region of both maxilla and mandible, the differences were not statistically significant 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In our study, the total energy density was considered as 6 J/cm 2 , which can be evaluated within the biological optimal parameters. Studies have used different laser parameters such as 637 nm wavelength at 40 mW average output, 35 at 830 nm wavelength 10 mW average output 31 or 830 nm wavelength at 86 mW average output 21 for treatment of implant stabilization and were reported different results. In our study reported that PBMT at 830 nm wavelength and 126 mW average output was not effective on stabilization or microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animal studies have all reported that photo therapy with low levels of light can provide greater bone-implant interface strength and also improve the osseointegration process (Table 2). 6,15,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Removal torque values increased significantly along with time even after a single laser irradiation compared with a nonirradiated control group in the study by Boldrini et al 24 Gomes et al have interestingly shown that higher energy levels (10 or 20 J/cm 2 ) promote more implant-bone contact compared with a lower energy (5 J/cm 2 ). Better ISQ values were also observed in the 20 J/cm 2 group (this article was published in the Quintessense journal in the same year with the Mayer et al bibliography).…”
Section: Can Photobiomodulation Influence Ti Implant Stability?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(continued) laser therapy (LLLT) groups. 25,30,31,33 However, Torkzaban et al found no significant effect of adjunctive 940-nm low laser therapy on implant stability. In another randomized clinical trial, García-Morales (2012) reported that LLL was not able to significantly increase implant stability when assessed by resonance frequency analysis (RFA).…”
Section: Can Photobiomodulation Influence Ti Implant Stability?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Out of this, 68 articles were excluded based on the exclusion criteria. At the end of the study selection, 10 articles were included for qualitative [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and 7 for quantitative analysis. [18][19][20][22][23][24]27 The study screening and the selection of articles is explained in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%