Abstract:Resumo Objetiv Avaliar o ambiente hospitalar onde a enfermagem exerce sua prática comparando hospitais públicos e privados e descrever as características que receberam avaliação desfavorável (≤ 2,5 pontos) na percepção dos profissionais. Métodos Estudo comparativo e transversal realizado em cinco hospitais (dois públicos - A e B e três privados - C, D e E) de um município do interior do estado de São Paulo, com 1773 profissionais de enfermagem. Os instrumentos utilizados foram: ficha para caracterização da… Show more
“…Note that, even though the subscale "Adequate staffing and resources" obtained positive scores, both the AG (2.71) and NG (2.51) obtained low means. This finding has been reported worldwide [23][24][27][28][29] , not only because the nursing team is understaffed 30 , which leads to work overload and consequently harm work processes 1 , but also because the nurses do not have opportunities to discuss the care delivered to patients with other nurses and not infrequently, there are no services supporting them in the perform the of tasks.…”
Objective: to correlate the nurses’ self-perception and the perception of nursing aides regarding coaching leadership and the practice environment within Primary Health Care. Method: cross-sectional and correlational study addressing 150 nursing workers: 75 nurses and 75 nursing aides of 13 Basic Health Units located in the south of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. The Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale, Questionário de Autopercepção do Enfermeiro no Exercício da Liderança [Questionnaire on Self-Perception of Nurses of Exercise of Leadership], and Questionário de Percepção de Técnicos e Auxiliares de Enfermagem no Exercício da Liderança [Questionnaire on Perception of Nurse Technicians and LPNs of Exercise of Leadership] were applied between January and May 2019. Univariate and Multivariate Analyses, and the Pearson’s Correlation test (p<0.05) were used, besides Rosenthal effect size. Results: two significant correlations were found among the nurses between the instruments’ domains: communication and nursing foundations for quality care (r=0.265; p=0.022) and communication and collegial nurse-physician relationships (r=0.263; p=0.023). The following stand out among the nursing aides: communication and nursing foundations for quality care (r=0.416) and the total score obtained in the Questionnaire on Perception of Nurse Technicians and LPNs of Exercise of Leadership and collegial nurse-physician relationships (r=0.409). Conclusion: for the nurses, communication contributed to a better perception of quality care and good relationships with physicians. For the nursing aides, all the domains of coaching leadership collaborate for environments that favor their practice within PHC.
“…Note that, even though the subscale "Adequate staffing and resources" obtained positive scores, both the AG (2.71) and NG (2.51) obtained low means. This finding has been reported worldwide [23][24][27][28][29] , not only because the nursing team is understaffed 30 , which leads to work overload and consequently harm work processes 1 , but also because the nurses do not have opportunities to discuss the care delivered to patients with other nurses and not infrequently, there are no services supporting them in the perform the of tasks.…”
Objective: to correlate the nurses’ self-perception and the perception of nursing aides regarding coaching leadership and the practice environment within Primary Health Care. Method: cross-sectional and correlational study addressing 150 nursing workers: 75 nurses and 75 nursing aides of 13 Basic Health Units located in the south of São Paulo, SP, Brazil. The Brazilian version of the Practice Environment Scale, Questionário de Autopercepção do Enfermeiro no Exercício da Liderança [Questionnaire on Self-Perception of Nurses of Exercise of Leadership], and Questionário de Percepção de Técnicos e Auxiliares de Enfermagem no Exercício da Liderança [Questionnaire on Perception of Nurse Technicians and LPNs of Exercise of Leadership] were applied between January and May 2019. Univariate and Multivariate Analyses, and the Pearson’s Correlation test (p<0.05) were used, besides Rosenthal effect size. Results: two significant correlations were found among the nurses between the instruments’ domains: communication and nursing foundations for quality care (r=0.265; p=0.022) and communication and collegial nurse-physician relationships (r=0.263; p=0.023). The following stand out among the nursing aides: communication and nursing foundations for quality care (r=0.416) and the total score obtained in the Questionnaire on Perception of Nurse Technicians and LPNs of Exercise of Leadership and collegial nurse-physician relationships (r=0.409). Conclusion: for the nurses, communication contributed to a better perception of quality care and good relationships with physicians. For the nursing aides, all the domains of coaching leadership collaborate for environments that favor their practice within PHC.
“…18 In this context, the adequate dimensioning of the professionals minimizes the workload, since the relocation of the team within the hospital institution must be consistent with the local complexities. 19 In view of this, 68 (96%) of the nurses in the total sample, assume the leadership style of "persuading" in their work process. This style gives high emphasis on the task and the relationship, is appropriate for the leader to employ with leaders with low/moderate level of maturity, who are not yet able to perform the task, but has the willingness to take responsibility and has confidence in himself, needing only be trained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the leader is among the low/moderate levels, as presented in the study, the leader must offer guidance and monitoring necessary for the leader to develop autonomy in his actions. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] In this sense, the styles are adopted depending on the variables of behavior: task, relationship and maturity of the nursing team. Being that the variable "task" is that the leaders adopt to organize and to define functions, to explain activities and to establish patterns; the variable of relationship is adopted to maintain personal relations, opening channels of communication between collaborators.…”
Objetivo: analisar o perfil de liderança dos enfermeiros de um hospital do oeste catarinense, sob a ótica do modelo de Liderança Situacional. Método: estudo quantitativo transversal, realizado com 71 enfermeiros. A coleta de dados deu-se entre os meses de julho a setembro de 2017, na qual utilizou-se um instrumento da teoria situacional. A análise foi a estatística descritiva. Resultado: com a pesquisa é possível afirmar que o estilo de liderança persuadir foi o predominante nos enfermeiros; os líderes possuem um grau de efetividade positivo quanto a adaptabilidade de estilo de liderança, estando a sua maioria na faixa de eficácia. Conclusão: a partir dos resultados identificados considera-se que o enfermeiro, ao desenvolver sua assistência profissional, deve estar apto a liderar uma equipe de enfermagem no ambiente hospitalar, visto que, a melhoria da qualidade da assistência prestada depende do trabalho coletivo.
“…Although health research has already focused on the professional practice environments (1,3) for more than a decade, the appeal launched by the ICN on May 12 th , 2007, had a positive impact, culminating in the establishment of "favorable environments for the practice" as a priority program. Since in some countries there are different levels of training in Nursing, nurses, technicians and nursing assistants have been considered for the assessment of the professional practice environments (4) .…”
Objective: To identify the instruments used to evaluate the professional nursing practice environments in the hospital context. Method: An integrative review, whose research process was conducted independently by two researchers in the period from July to August 2019 in the CINHAL, PubMed and SciELO databases. Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 studies published between 2009 and 2019 were considered for analysis. Ten instruments and three thematic areas were identified: instruments for the assessment of the nursing professional practice environments; implications of the use of instruments for the assessment of nursing professional practice environments; limitations of the instruments for the assessment of nursing professional practice environments. Conclusion: Despite the relevance of the instruments identified, this integrative review provides contributions that support the need to use specific tools to assess the nursing practice environments that include the structure, process and outcome components.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.