2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17113874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analysis of Well-Being and Anxiety among University Students

Abstract: This article aims to interrelate dimensions of the well-being validation instruments proposed by Watson, Clark and Tellegen (PANAS) with generalized anxiety dimensions proposed by Spitzer et al. (GAD-7) and state-trait anxiety inventories proposed by Biaggio and Natalício (IDATE), using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), in the case of individual university students in southern Brazil and the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. We conducted a behavioral study, characterized as explorato… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, there was a negative association between satisfaction with life and state-anxiety. The associations between the levels of anxiety and subjective well-being (i.e., negative, and positive affect as well as satisfaction with life), have been reported in past literature (Beutel et al, 2016;Eldeleklioğlu, 2015;Dias Lopes et al, 2020) including in studies carried out in this period of confinement which was experienced in different countries (Luo et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the present study, there was a negative association between satisfaction with life and state-anxiety. The associations between the levels of anxiety and subjective well-being (i.e., negative, and positive affect as well as satisfaction with life), have been reported in past literature (Beutel et al, 2016;Eldeleklioğlu, 2015;Dias Lopes et al, 2020) including in studies carried out in this period of confinement which was experienced in different countries (Luo et al, 2021;Smith et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…La versión española reveló una fiabilidad de .94 (García-Campayo et al, 2010). En Argentina, esta escala obtuvo una consistencia interna de .93 (Dias Lopes et al, 2020). Para la muestra del presente estudio se obtuvo un valor de fiabilidad de .85.…”
Section: Materialesunclassified
“…It is a fear of the unknown that makes the individual feel unstable, fear of death and facing future life, as well as fear of social and political change expected in the future to negatively expect everything that holds the future. Thus, it causes pessimism and disappointment that may reach a dizzying level (Lopes et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%