2002
DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.10.4925-4931.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ammonia Production by Ruminal Microorganisms and Enumeration, Isolation, and Characterization of Bacteria Capable of Growth on Peptides and Amino Acids from the Sheep Rumen

Abstract: Excessive NH 3 production in the rumen is a major nutritional inefficiency in ruminant animals. Experiments were undertaken to compare the rates of NH 3 production from different substrates in ruminal fluid in vitro and to assess the role of asaccharolytic bacteria in NH 3 production. Ruminal fluid was taken from four rumenfistulated sheep receiving a mixed hay-concentrate diet. The calculated rate of NH 3 production from Trypticase varied from 1.8 to 19.7 nmol mg of protein ؊1 min ؊1 depending on the substrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
1
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
78
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in ruminal ammonia production when monensin is supplied can be attributed to inhibitory effects on hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria (Eschenlauer et al, 2002) which have peptidase and deaminase activities (Wallace et al, 1997). Chitosan may have the same effect of monensin in ruminal protein degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in ruminal ammonia production when monensin is supplied can be attributed to inhibitory effects on hyper-ammonia-producing bacteria (Eschenlauer et al, 2002) which have peptidase and deaminase activities (Wallace et al, 1997). Chitosan may have the same effect of monensin in ruminal protein degradation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the rumen (Debroas & Blanchart, 1993), and has been restricted to molecular inventories in protein-containing wastewaters (Tang et al, 2005). The major difference between protein degradation in the rumen and in anaerobic digesters is that, in the rumen, the ruminal bacteria (both saccharolytic and asaccharolytic) grow on amino acids and peptides as major energy substrates (Eschenlauer et al, 2002). In anaerobic reactors, however, proteolytic bacteria predominantly mediate protein degradation and the process involved is energy yielding (Ramsay & Pullammanappallil, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species were based on strains from gingival and subgingival sites in humans with periodontitis. A third species with one strain (A2) from the rumen of a sheep had been informally named 'Atopobium oviles' (Eschenlauer et al, 2002) and was renamed 'Olsenella oviles' by Dewhirst et al (2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods and results of isolation, 16S rRNA gene sequencebased identification and initial phenotypic characterization were described in detail by Eschenlauer et al (2002). Strains lac15, lac16 and lac31 T were isolated from the mucosal jejunum of a pig that also harboured lac18 T , the type strain of Veillonella magna, at the Institute of Animal Nutrition in 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%