SAE Technical Paper Series 2003
DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-1691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Review of Array Techniques for Noise Source Location

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once defined the calculation grid, the simplest algorithm that can be used is the delay-and-sum one. With this algorithm, it is possible to define the minimum working frequency for a 30° opening angle as [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Once defined the calculation grid, the simplest algorithm that can be used is the delay-and-sum one. With this algorithm, it is possible to define the minimum working frequency for a 30° opening angle as [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…being f T [Hz] the sidelobe threshold frequency [12]. The frequency range obtained can be used for the case of the beamforming delay-and-sum algorithm and could be increased if other algorithms (such as minimum variance or Capon [15], clean-SC [16], DAMAS [17], beamforming through using eigenvalues and eigenvectors [18], MUSIC [19], or orthogonal beamforming [20]) are used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acoustic field inverse problem can be solved quickly and efficiently to achieve sound field reconstruction and noise source identification by microphone array technology [1][2][3][4] . At present, a variety of algorithms have been used to solve the acoustic inverse problem, such as: Beamforming [5][6][7] , NAH [8,9] , statistically optimized near-field acoustical holography (SONAH) [10][11][12] , inverse boundary element method (IBEM) [13,14] , Helmholtz equation-least squares (HELS) [15,16] , Bayesian approach [17,18] and ESM [19,20] . These algorithms have different assumptions and application scopes in terms of source surface structure, sources spatial distribution, array geometry, propagation type and source frequency range [21] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these algorithms, Beamforming, whose spatial resolution is inversely proportional to the ratio of the array size and the wavelength, assumes that the monopoles have sparse distribution in space. This method is suitable for middle and long distances measurement using irregular array or random array, and has good performance for middle and high frequency noise source identification [5] . In the near field, NAH has good performance for low frequency noise source identification under the assumption that the propagation of acoustic wave is in the free field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%