2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly stable reliable SRAM cell design for low power applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shorter T RA of the SEHF11T compared to the FD8T cell can be explained by the body‐source voltage ( V BS ) effect caused by read buffer in the cell and increase in the QB node voltage of FD8T during read operation 36 . Assuming Q / QB stores “0”/“1” during read operation, it is observed that the intermediate node voltage of X 2 in the SEHF11T goes up from zero to 112 mV and then gradually goes down to 107 mV at the time of recording of T RA .…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Shorter T RA of the SEHF11T compared to the FD8T cell can be explained by the body‐source voltage ( V BS ) effect caused by read buffer in the cell and increase in the QB node voltage of FD8T during read operation 36 . Assuming Q / QB stores “0”/“1” during read operation, it is observed that the intermediate node voltage of X 2 in the SEHF11T goes up from zero to 112 mV and then gradually goes down to 107 mV at the time of recording of T RA .…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The body bias acts as a tuning knob to reimburse for parameter variations 37 . Body biasing, contrarily, is more effective for fluctuations addressing in various design metrics because of process and temperature variations 36 . Therefore, from Figure 7B, which indicates the reliability of SRAM cells under PVT variations, it is observed a 1.17X, 1.11X, and 1.07X improvement in T RA distribution, in terms of T RA variability, in the SEHF11T compared to FD8T, HFBS9T, and SEDF9T at V DD = 0.7 V, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many SRAM bit-cell design [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] have been presented to enhance circuit stability for robust low voltage/power operation. In [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ], are provided stacked transistors to solve the problem of half-selected read error, but they bring worse write capacity. In order to overcome this problem, a word line boost circuit technology to improve the write capability are presented in [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%