Summary This paper presents an 11 transistor (SEHF11T) static random access memory (SRAM) cell with high read static noise margin (RSNM) and write static noise margin (WSNM). It eliminates the write half‐select disturb using cross‐point data‐aware write word lines, which can mitigate bit‐interleaving structure to reduce multiple‐bit upset and increase soft‐error immunity. We evaluated and analyzed the effect of process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) variations on various design metrics and compared it with other cells. The SEHF11T performs fast read operation due to its higher read current and slow write operation due to its single‐ended nature. It employs the read decoupling technique to enhance the RSNM. The stacked transistors in the left/right half‐cell increase the RSNM. In addition, the WSNM is improved by eliminating the feedback of cross‐coupled inverters pair during write operation by means of power‐cutoff write‐assist technique. The proposed cell shows 1.11X higher RSNM and 1.37X higher WSNM compared to fully differential 8T (FD8T) cell. The stacked transistors in the cell reduce leakage power dissipation. The SEHF11T consumes 0.47X lower leakage power compared to FD8T at VDD = 0.7 V. Furthermore, it exhibits high reliability against PVT variations in subthreshold region and shows 1.09X narrower spread in leakage power than that of FD8T at VDD = 0.3 V.

No abstract

Graphene nanoribbon and transition metal dichalcogenide field-effect transistors (GNRFETs and TMDFETs) have emerged as favorable candidates to replace conventional metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) transistor in future technologies. Their competence must be proven through the study and evaluation of various circuits, including static random access memories (SRAMs). Therefore, this paper presents a single-ended 12T (SE12T) SRAM cell designed using GNRFETs and TMDFETs to evaluate their performance. The proposed SE12T cell designed with GNRFETs/TMDFET device improves read static noise margin by 1.95Â/3.20Â and incurs a penalty of 1.16Â/1.14Â in read delay compared to the GNRFETs/TMDFET-based fully differential 8T cell through a read buffer, decoupling the bitline from the storing nodes during the read operation. Furthermore, two transmission gates (TGs) placed inside the cell core cut off the feedback of cross-coupled inverters pair during the write operation, enhancing write static noise margin by 1.65Â/1.71Â. These two TGs along with high logic level of virtual ground (V GND ) control signal during hold mode reduce leakage power. Existence of a higher number of p-type MOS (PMOS) devices, the presence of stacked transistors, and being single-ended bitcell further reduce this metric, nearly 1.48Â/1.17Â designed with GNRFETs/TMDFET device as compared to FD8T. Furthermore, it is observed from the results that GNRFET-based designs have better performance than those of their TMDFET counterparts. The proposed cell eliminates write half-select disturb, and therefore, bit-interleaving architecture can be applied to reduce multi-bit errors.

The design of power‐efficient SRAM cells is necessary for biomedical applications such as body area networks (BANs) to extent their battery life. SRAM cell's power consists of two main components, including leakage power and dynamic power, in which the former overcomes the latter in advanced technology. This paper presents a low‐leakage single‐bitline 9T (L2SB9T) SRAM cell. The proposed design is free from read‐disturbance issue and eliminates writing “1” problem. The results are carried out by utilizing HSPICE and 16‐nm CMOS PTM at a 0.7 V, 25°C, and under severe PVT variations. The proposed L2SB9T SRAM cell is comprehensively compared with other recently published SRAM cells including conventional 6T, write/read enhanced 8T (WRE8T), transmission‐gate 9T (TG9T), read‐disturb‐free 9T (RDF9T), fully differential 10T (Chang10T), data‐independent read port 10T (DIRP10T), and single‐bitline 11T (SB11T). It shows at least 1.26X/1.07X/1.01X improvement in read static noise margin (RSNM)/write static noise margin (WSNM)/write margin (WM). Furthermore, the leakage power is reduced by the proposed cell, at least 1.137X. Moreover, the suggested cell consumes the third/second best dynamic read/write power, which is 1.42X/1.37X lower than that of conventional 6T SRAM cell. The proposed L2SB9T SRAM cell performs its read/write operation reliably by showing at least 1.71X narrower speared in RSNM compared to the best SRAM cell and third best WM variability. For all these improvements, the proposed L2SB9T SRAM cell incurs a 4.20X/1.06X/1.808X penalty in read delay/write delay/layout area when compared with the best SRAM cells, that is, the Chang10T/6T/6T.

No abstract