2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2023.154565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A carbon nano-tube field effect transistor based stable, low-power 8T static random access memory cell with improved write access time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…45nm GPDK files are used in CMOS, whereas, for 45nm CNTFET Verilog-A CNTFET Model by Stanford university has been utilized. 34 A. Sachdeva et al 32 has represented nMOSFET and nCNTFET sweep for input and output characteristics at 1V supply voltage at typical V T . On a similar trend, pMOSFET and pCNTFET sweeps for input and output characteristics at 1V supply voltage have been presented.…”
Section: Cntfet: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45nm GPDK files are used in CMOS, whereas, for 45nm CNTFET Verilog-A CNTFET Model by Stanford university has been utilized. 34 A. Sachdeva et al 32 has represented nMOSFET and nCNTFET sweep for input and output characteristics at 1V supply voltage at typical V T . On a similar trend, pMOSFET and pCNTFET sweeps for input and output characteristics at 1V supply voltage have been presented.…”
Section: Cntfet: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, there is a need to look for different potential alternatives to CMOS. It is found that carbon nanotube field‐effect transistors (CNTFET) and graphene nanoribbon field‐effect transistors (GNRFET) have a higher power of switch, curves with more ideal voltage, and better mobility, consequently, they can be favorable replacements for CMOS 11–14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is found that carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNTFET) and graphene nanoribbon field-effect transistors (GNRFET) have a higher power of switch, curves with more ideal voltage, and better mobility, consequently, they can be favorable replacements for CMOS. [11][12][13][14] GNRFET, unlike CNTFET, is compatible with the existing CMOS manufacturing technologies. CNTFET has alignment and transfer-related issues, which can be resolved by GNRFET.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] However, shrinking the feature size of the metal-oxidesemiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) beyond 32 nm has led to critical problems such as high current leakage, large parametric variations, unreliability, short-channel effects, and decreasing gate control. [4][5][6][7] These problems reduce the suitability of the MOSFET for power/energy-efficient applications. 5 In response, researchers have proposed various new alternative solutions and technologies to traditional MOSFET technology, such as fin-based FET (FinFET), [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] carbon nanotube-based FET (CNTFET), 6,7,15,16 and graphene nanoribbon-based FET (GNRFET).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] These problems reduce the suitability of the MOSFET for power/energy-efficient applications. 5 In response, researchers have proposed various new alternative solutions and technologies to traditional MOSFET technology, such as fin-based FET (FinFET), [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] carbon nanotube-based FET (CNTFET), 6,7,15,16 and graphene nanoribbon-based FET (GNRFET). 4,[17][18][19] Among these emerging technologies, GNRFET offers excellent properties and is compatible with existing silicon-based MOSFET, and is an attractive option for achieving higher performance and efficiency in future electronic devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%