2004 Symposium on VLSI Circuits. Digest of Technical Papers (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37525)
DOI: 10.1109/vlsic.2004.1346505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.9V 66MHz access, 0.13um 8M(256K×32) local SONOS embedded flash EEPROM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A WEP <10 −6 can be achieved with an 80 ns write time. This is still much faster than flash memories, which demonstrate write delays in orders of few microseconds [2]. We tabulated our results in comparison with the state-ofthe-art present memory types in Table II.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A WEP <10 −6 can be achieved with an 80 ns write time. This is still much faster than flash memories, which demonstrate write delays in orders of few microseconds [2]. We tabulated our results in comparison with the state-ofthe-art present memory types in Table II.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flash memories, as nonvolatile CMOS memories, demonstrate relatively high data density and read throughput, but they have low write and erase speeds, Manuscript as well as they require high voltages for programming and erasing. The work by Seo et al [2] dissipate 7 mA at 66 MHz read throughput and has 20 μs write delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies [1]- [3] have been performed in order to find the best tradeoff between the complexity of the architecture and the performances offered in terms of data retention and endurance. However, such a technology sometimes failed to provide enough safe margin for extremely high temperatures applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, FeRAM operates within VDD and no pumping circuit is involved. Thus, even if one cell footprint is large for FeRAM, .8.34 FeRAM in small-density application (a)[60] ( c 1996 IEEE) and comparison between FeRAM (b)[50] ( c 2005 IEEE) and FLASH (c)[61] ( c 2004 IEEE) for large-capacity devices…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%