Evaluation of trypan blue stain in a haemocytometer for rapid detection of cerebrospinal fluid sterility in HIV patients with cryptococcal meningitis

Abstract

BackgroundQuantitative culture is the most common method to determine the fungal burden and sterility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) among persons with cryptococcal meningitis. A major drawback of cultures is a long turnaround-time. Recent evidence demonstrates that live and dead Cryptococcus yeasts can be distinguished using trypan blue staining. We hypothesized that trypan blue staining combined with haemocytometer counting may provide a rapid estimation of quantitative culture count and detection of CSF sterility. To test this, we evaluated 194 CSF specimens from 96 HIV-infected participants with cryptococcal meningitis in Kampala, Uganda. Cryptococcal meningitis was diagnosed by CSF cryptococcal antigen (CRAG). We stained CSF with trypan blue and quantified yeasts using a haemocytometer. We compared the haemocytometer readings versus quantitative Cryptococcus CSF cultures.ResultsHaemocytometer counting with trypan blue staining had a sensitivity of 98% (64/65), while CSF cultures had a sensitivity of 95% (62/65) with reference to CSF CRAG for diagnostic CSF specimens. For samples that were positive in both tests, the haemocytometer had higher readings compared to culture. For diagnostic specimens, the median of log10 transformed counts were 5.59 (n = 64, IQR = 5.09 to 6.05) for haemocytometer and 4.98 (n = 62, IQR = 3.75 to 5.79) for culture; while the overall median counts were 5.35 (n = 189, IQR = 4.78–5.84) for haemocytometer and 3.99 (n = 151, IQR = 2.59–5.14) for cultures. The percentage agreement with culture sterility was 2.4% (1/42). Counts among non-sterile follow-up specimens had a median of 5.38 (n = 86, IQR = 4.74 to 6.03) for haemocytometer and 2.89 (n = 89, IQR = 2.11 to 4.38) for culture. At diagnosis, CSF quantitative cultures correlated with haemocytometer counts (R2 = 0.59, P < 0.001). At 7–14 days, quantitative cultures did not correlate with haemocytometer counts (R2 = 0.43, P = 0.4).ConclusionDespite a positive correlation, the haemocytometer counts with trypan blue staining did not predict the outcome of quantitative cultures in patients receiving antifungal therapy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-017-1093-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Validation of an automated cell counting method for cGMP manufacturing of human induced pluripotent stem cells

“…Indeed, automation is pivotal in cell manufacturing applications, as it increases reproducibility and reduce time consumption, paving the way to industrial translation [20] . More specifically, the counting time using an hematocytometer has been found to increase almost linearly with sample concentration [21] , ranging from around 30 seconds with 4 × 10 4 cells/mL to around 3 min with 8 × 10 5 cells/mL [22] . On the other hand, the analysis time using an automated cell counter is independent on cell concentration.…”

Anti-inflammatory activity of nicotine isolated from Brassica oleracea in rheumatoid arthritis

“…Live cells (unstained) that did not take the stain were considered. Dead cells were stained [ 22 ]. Cell survivability or viability was counted using formula [ 23 ] (Supplementary Figure S1).…”

Cell Cytometry: Review and Perspective on Biotechnological Advances

“…Cell viability, which is essential to assess the kinetics of growth, is performed by the selective staining of the sample using various staining approaches. Vital exclusion stains are commonly used to mark cells that have lost membrane integrity such as Trypan Blue or inclusion stains which mark cells retaining membrane integrity such as Fluorescein Diacetate (Kwizera et al, 2017). Hemocytometer is not limited to certain staining methods and allows all staining techniques according to the purpose of the analyses.…”