BackgroundIncreased antiretroviral therapy (ART) availability has been associated with more patients developing cryptococcosis after ART initiation. Despite this changing epidemiology, data regarding cryptococcal meningitis in those already receiving ART are limited. We compared clinical presentations and outcomes among ART-naïve and ART-experienced Ugandans.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 605 HIV-infected persons with first-episode cryptococcal meningitis from August 2013 to May 2017 who received amphotericin-based combination therapy. We classified participants by ART status and ART duration and compared groups for 2-week survival.ResultsOverall, 46% (281/605) of participants were receiving ART at presentation. Compared with those not receiving ART, those receiving ART had higher CD4 counts (P < .001) and lower cerebrospinal fluid fungal burdens (P < .001). Of those receiving ART, 56% (156/281) initiated ART within 6 months, and 18% (51/281) initiated ART within 14 days. Two-week mortality did not differ by ART status (27% in both ART-naïve and ART-experienced%; P > .99). However, 47% (24/51) of those receiving ART for ≤14 days died within 2 weeks, compared with 19% (20/105) of those receiving ART for 15–182 days and 26% (32/125) of those receiving ART for >6 months (P < .001). Among persons receiving ART for >6 months, 87% had HIV viral loads >1000 copies/mL.ConclusionsCryptococcosis after ART initiation is common in Africa. Patients initiating ART who unmask cryptococcal meningitis are at a high risk of death. Immune recovery in the setting of central nervous system infection is detrimental, and management of this population requires further study. Implementing pre-ART cryptococcal antigen screening is urgently needed to prevent cryptococcal meningitis after ART initiation.

No abstract

Cryptococcal antigenemia with meningitis symptoms was the third most common meningitis etiology. We postulate this is early cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. Fluconazole monotherapy was suboptimal, despite Cryptococcus-negative CSF. Further studies are warranted to understand the clinical course and optimal management of this distinct entity.

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture can determine a quantitative viability of Cryptococcus yeasts; however, culture has a long turnaround-time. The TC20 automated cell counter (Bio-Rad) is a benchtop instrument used to count cells in 30 seconds. In vitro studies suggest trypan blue staining can distinguish between viable and dead cryptococcal yeasts. We hypothesized that trypan blue staining with automated cell counting may provide rapid quantification of viable CSF Cryptococcus yeasts. In sum, 96 HIV-infected participants with cryptococcal meningitis were enrolled and provided 194 CSF specimens in Kampala, Uganda. Cryptococcosis was diagnosed by CSF cryptococcal antigen (CRAG). CSF was stained with trypan blue and quantified yeasts with the TC20 cell counter. We compared the log10 transformed cell counter readings with gating of 4-10 μm versus log10 quantitative Cryptococcus cultures/ml. TC20 showed more positive results (95.4%) overall than culture (78.4%) with reference to CSF CRAG. TC20 had higher readings compared to culture in most cases with only a 25% level of agreement between the two methods. TC20 had a poor correlation to culture throughout the 14 days of antifungal therapy. The median of log10 transformed counts were 5.22 (IQR = 4.79-5.44) for the TC20 and 3.99 (IQR = 2.59-5.14) for culture. Overall, a linear regression showed no significant relationship between the TC20 and culture (r = -0.0025; P = .92). TC20 automated cell counting with trypan blue staining was poorly predictive of the quantitative CSF culture and could not be used as a substitute for quantitative culture.