2022
DOI: 10.1590/dados.2022.65.1.000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparência em DADOS: submissões, pareceristas e diversidade no fluxo editorial dos últimos anos *

Abstract: RESUMO Este editorial discute dados gerais sobre o fluxo dos manuscritos submetidos na revista DADOS , bem como os desafios que a publicação enfrentou nos últimos anos. Apresentamos aqui uma análise cienciométrica de diversas dimensões do nosso trabalho, desde as submissões recebidas até o perfil de seus pareceres e pareceristas, passando pelas persistentes desigualdades de gênero e de origem geográfica nesses âmbitos e pelas diferentes métricas de impacto da revista. Pretendemos assim garantir a mais ampla tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There also was a decrease in scientific productivity, especially among women who had children and Black women (Staniscuaski et al 2021). Other studies revealed an increase in the gender asymmetry of article and paper submissions in various disciplines, including types of authorship in political science (Campos and Candido 2022;Cui, Ding, and Zhu 2020;Dolan and Lawless 2020;Squazzoni et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There also was a decrease in scientific productivity, especially among women who had children and Black women (Staniscuaski et al 2021). Other studies revealed an increase in the gender asymmetry of article and paper submissions in various disciplines, including types of authorship in political science (Campos and Candido 2022;Cui, Ding, and Zhu 2020;Dolan and Lawless 2020;Squazzoni et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of female representation in leadership roles is evident in academic settings across various regions, including North America (American Political Science Association 2004); South America (Carpiuc 2016; Fernández 2006); Europe (Abels and Woods 2015; Bates, Jenkins, and Pflaeger 2012; Kantola 2008, 2015); and Asia and Oceania (Abu-Laban, Sawer, and St-Laurent 2018; Curtin 2013). 1 There are numerous types of gender asymmetries, such as in the metrics of career progressions (Akhtar et al 2005; American Political Science Association 2004); authorship of articles (Campos and Candido 2022; Teele and Thelen 2017; Williams et al 2015) and books (Samuels and Teele 2021); citations received (Dion, Sumner, and Mitchell 2018); distribution of thematic areas (Candido, Campos, and Feres Júnior 2021; Key and Sumner 2019); and evaluation of professors (Chávez and Mitchell 2020). Racial diversity indicators are less frequent but tend to demonstrate that disparities between white and Black scholars are even more extreme (Ards and Woodard 1992; Candido, Feres Júnior, and Campos 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%