Productive potential and interaction of elite bean lines with environments in the Central Cerrado of Brazil

Júnior, V. de A. Pontes; Melo, L. C.; Pereira, H. S.; Peloso, M. J. Del; Faria, L. C. de; Wendland, A.; Braz, A. J. B. P.; Ferreira, Sindynara

doi:10.1590/s1984-70332012000100002

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A significant C x E interaction has previously been described for flowering (Mambrin et al, 2015), cycle Ribeiro et al, 2004Ribeiro et al, , 2014, insertion of the first pod (Ribeiro et al, 2014;Maziero et al, 2015), and grain yield (Elias et al, 2007;Melo et al, 2007;Rocha et al, 2010;Pontes Júnior et al, 2012;Domingues et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2009aPereira et al, ,b, 2010Pereira et al, , 2014Barili et al, 2015a,b) in experiments evaluating the performance of common bean cultivars. The existence of a significant C x E interaction indicates that the stability analyses may be useful for the identification of superior cultivars.…”

Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancementioning

confidence: 81%

“…Cultivars with a lower Pi value, identified according to the Lin and Binns (1988) method, are desirable, since they indicate lower deviations in relation to the maximal grain yield of each environment, i.e., their performance was close to the maximum in most environments. This method has been broadly used to identify common bean cultivars with stability for grain yield, since it is easy to analyze and interpret the results (Carbonell et al, 2007;Melo et al, 2007;Pereira et al, 2009aPereira et al, , 2009bPontes Júnior et al, 2012;Domingues et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013).…”

Section: Stability For Insertion Of the First Pod And Grain Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The stability of common bean grain yield has been extensively evaluated using the Eberhart and Russell (1966), Lin and Binns (1988), and additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) methods (Carbonell et al, 2007;Melo et al, 2007;Pontes Júnior et al, 2012;Domingues et al, 2013;Silva et al, 2013;Pereira et al, 2009aPereira et al, ,b, 2014Barili et al, 2015a,b). Cycle stability in common bean has been studied using the Eberhart and Russell (1966) method, although few environments were considered (Ribeiro et al, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simultaneous selection in beans for stability and high agronomic performance

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The objective of this study was to select common bean cultivars based on their stability for flowering, cycle, insertion of the first pod, grain yield, and high agronomic performance. Twenty experiments were carried out between 2000 and 2014, during two growing seasons, in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The Eberhart and Russel, and Lin and Binns methods, as well as the additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) method, were used to evaluate the stability of flowering, cycle, insertion of the first pod, and grain yield of 10 common cultivars in all experiments. The Eberhart and Russel, Lin and Binns, and AMMI methods identified the Carioca cultivar as the most stable for insertion of the first pod, and the Iraí cultivar as the most instable for flowering and cycle. The Pérola cultivar shows stability for flowering, cycle, and insertion of the first pod, and Guapo Brilhante is stable for grain yield, according to the Lin and Binns method. Controlled crossing between Pérola and Guapo Brilhante is recommended for the development of new common bean cultivars with greater stability for semi-early cycle, architecture of upright plant, and grain yield.

show abstract

Section: Joint Analysis Of Variancementioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Stability For Insertion Of the First Pod And Grain Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simultaneous selection in beans for stability and high agronomic performance

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Alvares et al (2016), however, studied four carioca seeded populations and confirmed the monogenic segregation obtained by Silva et al (2008). Some common bean elite lines of the carioca and pinto market classes have been well phenotypically characterized and exhibit slow darkening (Faria et al, 2004; Beninger et al, 2005; Junk‐Knievel et al, 2008; Elsadr et al, 2011; Carneiro et al, 2012; Pontes Júnior et al, 2012). However, it is not known whether this phenotype is conferred by the same gene or by different genes.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic Control of Seed Coat Darkening in Common Bean Cultivars from Three Market Classes

Rodrigues

Souza

et al. 2019

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars with slow seed coat darkening benefit the growers by extending the seed storage period without losses in commercial quality. Seed coat darkening in pinto and carioca seeded common bean is controlled by recessive genes, but it is not known whether these genes are different or not. The objectives of this study were (i) to verify if the gene that controls seed coat darkening in common bean cultivars from different market classes is the same, and (ii) to evaluate the efficiency of the simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker Pvsd‐1158 and the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker PvbHLHp12804 linked to the Sd gene in identifying carioca and mulatinho seeded lines contrasting for seed coat darkening. Seventeen lines were used for genotypic and phenotypic evaluations in two trials, and F2:3 progenies obtained from crosses between one pinto bean line (Sd gene) and two carioca lines that have slow seed coat darkening were used in segregation tests. The result of the two markers was identical and shown 87.5% coincidence with phenotypic data. Only two lines, CNFM 11940 (mulatinho) and TAA Dama (carioca), exhibited slow seed coat darkening and marker alleles related to regular darkening. Therefore, there was recombination between the markers and the Sd gene, or there is another gene causing slow seed coat darkening in these lines. All F2:3 progenies exhibited slow seed coat darkening, indicating that there was no segregation. The two markers are efficient for assisted selection. Results of the genotypic evaluations and the segregation test indicating that the same gene (Sd) is responsible for seed coat darkening in pinto and carioca beans.

show abstract