2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1519-70772009000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poison pills no Brasil: um estudo exploratório

Abstract: RESUMOO objetivo precípuo deste trabalho foi fazer uma incursão sobre as poison pills. Quais são os aspectos conceituais, assim como as disposições legais e regulamentares aplicáveis às poison pills. Um levantamento das companhias abertas que se valem do referido instrumento defensivo, com corte até junho de 2006, foi procedido, de modo a saber que peculiaridades podem ser observadas em nosso ambiente. Ainda quanto ao objetivo do trabalho, foram apreciadas teorias que procuram explicar o comportamento de admin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the descriptive analysis, we find that approximately 25% of the sample companies have poison pills in their statutes, which corresponds to 55 publicly-traded companies, as demonstrated in Panel A of Table 3. This evidence is in line with Portulhak et al (2017), and also demonstrates that over the years there has been an increase in the adoption of this anti-takeover device in Brazil, given that in 2006, just seven Brazilian publicly-traded companies had poison pills, as indicated by Vieira et al (2009). Source: prepared by the authors.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the descriptive analysis, we find that approximately 25% of the sample companies have poison pills in their statutes, which corresponds to 55 publicly-traded companies, as demonstrated in Panel A of Table 3. This evidence is in line with Portulhak et al (2017), and also demonstrates that over the years there has been an increase in the adoption of this anti-takeover device in Brazil, given that in 2006, just seven Brazilian publicly-traded companies had poison pills, as indicated by Vieira et al (2009). Source: prepared by the authors.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysissupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, as a result of an evolutionary process of capital markets, it has been verified that companies with dispersed control or reasonably dispersed control of shares have now appeared in the Brazilian stock market (Gorga, 2009;Sternberg, Leal, & Bortolon, 2011;Portulhak, Theiss, Kühl, & Colauto, 2017;Crisóstomo, Freire, & Freitas, 2019), making it possible for potential acquirers to try to take over a company. This evidence has been corroborated by hostile takeovers which have occurred in Brazil such as the offer of Sadia for control of Perdigão (Vieira, Martins, & Fávero, 2009), of Cromossomo Participações II for control of Diagnósticos da América (Diagnósticos da América S. A., 2014), of Sapore for control of the International Meal Company (International Meal Company S. A., 2018), and of Energisa for control of Eletropaulo (Eletropaulo Metropolitana Eletricidade de São Paulo S. A., 2018), among others. Thus, it is considered relevant that Brazilian publicly-traded companies, which have higher levels of dispersion in terms of their ownership structure, have sought to adopt poison pills to protect their investors from possible hostile takeover bids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A negative sign is anticipated (Vieira, Martins & Fávero, 2009 . Using TA as a denominator prevents the development of non-existent variations in the dependent variable, as dividends behave in a more linear trend over time (Lintner, 1956) 10 .…”
Section: Table 1 Summary Of Factors That Influence Dividend Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No estudo desenvolvido por Vieira et al (2009) Um aspecto importante com relação às pí-lulas de veneno é a possibilidade de o estatuto da companhia impedir a sua remoção, o que é conhecido como cláusula pétrea. A cláusula pétrea obriga que o acionista que votar pela retirada desse mecanismo deve lançar uma OPA para todos os demais acionistas pagando um prêmio sobre a cotação da ação, conforme previsto no estatuto da companhia.…”
Section: Revisão Da Literaturaunclassified