2000
DOI: 10.1590/s1414-98932000000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profissionais para si ou para outros?: algumas reflexões sobre a formação dos psicólogos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is no different in the fi eld of psychological assessment (Bettoi & Simão, 2000;Hutz & Bandeira, 2003;Primi, 2010). This lack of defi nition creates diffi culties to determine what contents and technical methods need to be prioritized in basic education, which does not permit the establishment of skills and competences expected from newly graduates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is no different in the fi eld of psychological assessment (Bettoi & Simão, 2000;Hutz & Bandeira, 2003;Primi, 2010). This lack of defi nition creates diffi culties to determine what contents and technical methods need to be prioritized in basic education, which does not permit the establishment of skills and competences expected from newly graduates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this perspective, Nascimento, Manzini and Bocco (2006) affi rmed that the reconstruction of psi practice would For some decades, studies have been published that discuss psychological education in Brazil, revealing that, as early as in the 1970's, educational agents were concerned with this issue (Pereira & Carellos, 1995). In accordance with Bettoi and Simão (2000), the fundamental aspect in this discussion is the question about which professional only be possible through resistance against technical and compartmentalized activity logic, produced by the consumption society professionals and teaching institutions are inserted in. Nevertheless, Hutz and Bandeira (2003) highlighted that the lack of consensus about what it means to be a psychologist does not favor the search for an answer to the above problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%