2005
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-70542005000600023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da temperatura ambiente e do empenamento sobre o desempenho de frangas leves e semipesadas

Abstract: RESUMOEste trabalho foi conduzido para determinar os efeitos da temperatura ambiente e do empenamento das aves sobre o desempenho de duas linhagens de postura na fase de crescimento (10 a a 13 a semana de idade). Foram alojadas 480 aves de reposição da marca Hy-line, sendo 240 aves de cada linhagem W-36 (leve) e Brown (semipesada), em 5 câmaras climáticas com temperaturas de 12, 18, 24, 30 e 36ºC. Em cada temperatura foram avaliadas 3 coberturas de pena; 100% (não depenada), 50% (depenada em 50% do corpo) e 0%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Nascimento et al (2011), heat loss is related to specific feather coverage in each body part. Fukayama et al (2005) also reported that feather coverage in specific places may provide an extension of the heat loss surface, improving the thermal comfort range of the birds and allowing for some strains to better adapt to temperature ranges rather than others. In this sense, Yahav et al (1998) reported better adaptation to tropical climates by chickens without feathers in the neck, precisely due to this extra heat dissipating region on the neck.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nascimento et al (2011), heat loss is related to specific feather coverage in each body part. Fukayama et al (2005) also reported that feather coverage in specific places may provide an extension of the heat loss surface, improving the thermal comfort range of the birds and allowing for some strains to better adapt to temperature ranges rather than others. In this sense, Yahav et al (1998) reported better adaptation to tropical climates by chickens without feathers in the neck, precisely due to this extra heat dissipating region on the neck.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live performance is impaired when birds are reared at temperatures above their comfort zone due to reduced feed intake because dietary energy is used to maintain constant body temperature, instead of converting feed into meat (Fukayama et al, 2005;Laganá et al, 2007). Zhou & Yamamoto (1997) found that broiler body temperature increased three degrees Celsius (41 -44 ºC), and skin temperature increased 6 °C (37-43 ºC) when exposed to heat stress (36 °C) for three hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Macari et al (2004) and Abreu et al (2007), the ideal room temperature to provide thermal comfort for broiler chickens should be 30-32 o C in first week of age, [28][29][30] o C in the second week, 26-27 o C in the third week, [23][24][25][26] o C in the fourth week, 20-23 o C in the fifth week, and 20 o C in the sixth and seventh weeks. Some studies have demonstrated that nakedneck broiler chickens have a higher resistance to high temperatures, because they are able to dissipate more heat in function of a reduction of up to 40% in the number of feathers and, therefore, should be chosen for hot climates (Silva et al, 2001;Fukayama et al, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%