2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692005000500003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Follow-up of the child's motor abilities in day-care centers and pre-schools

Abstract: The aim was to describe the results of a developmental screening test in a cohort of 30 children attending 3 day-care centers in the city of São Paulo and develop hypotheses about these results. Thirty children were evaluated three times, during two years, by using the DDST. In the gross motor area the results improved (Tests of the Signs, 1st to the 3rd evaluation, p= 0.038*). There was a relationship between the age of the child (2 to 3 years) and worst results (Fisher's Exact test, p= 0.013*). In the fine m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
10
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In Brazil, however, there has been increasing concern with this model of care and its repercussions for children's motor development, possibly due to the number of studies that point to issues related to the professionals' qualification, infrastructure, strict routines focused mainly on feeding and hygiene, and greater exposure to infectious processes [5][6][7][8] . Santos et al 9 pointed out that, in Brazil, several studies have reported suspected delays in development, including motricity; however, the results are inconclusive because the prevalence of delays or suspected delays is very heterogeneous among the studies, ranging from 10% to 43% [10][11][12][13][14][15] . Other prominent aspects in the literature are the common discrepancies or differences in performance between the gross and fine motor subtests 11,13,15,16 , in addition to reports that the learning environment does not always promote infant motor development 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Brazil, however, there has been increasing concern with this model of care and its repercussions for children's motor development, possibly due to the number of studies that point to issues related to the professionals' qualification, infrastructure, strict routines focused mainly on feeding and hygiene, and greater exposure to infectious processes [5][6][7][8] . Santos et al 9 pointed out that, in Brazil, several studies have reported suspected delays in development, including motricity; however, the results are inconclusive because the prevalence of delays or suspected delays is very heterogeneous among the studies, ranging from 10% to 43% [10][11][12][13][14][15] . Other prominent aspects in the literature are the common discrepancies or differences in performance between the gross and fine motor subtests 11,13,15,16 , in addition to reports that the learning environment does not always promote infant motor development 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santos et al 9 pointed out that, in Brazil, several studies have reported suspected delays in development, including motricity; however, the results are inconclusive because the prevalence of delays or suspected delays is very heterogeneous among the studies, ranging from 10% to 43% [10][11][12][13][14][15] . Other prominent aspects in the literature are the common discrepancies or differences in performance between the gross and fine motor subtests 11,13,15,16 , in addition to reports that the learning environment does not always promote infant motor development 17,18 . The Brazilian studies reviewed in this article pointed to delays or suspected delays in motor development, however they did not analyze the process of this development in infants that attend day care centers, and the majority of studies performed only one developmental assessment (cross-sectional design).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O teste é considerado de fácil execução e oferece um manual para treinamento e orientações quanto à sua utilização. Pode ser aplicado por vários profissionais da saúde e, por isso, é um dos testes mais utilizados na triagem de atrasos, inclusive em nosso país 22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] . Embora o teste não seja validado para nossa população, uma adaptação cultural não formal foi realizada a fim de facilitar a sua aplicação 24 .…”
Section: Síntese Dos Dadosunclassified
“…It can be administered by several health professionals and, therefore, it is one of the tests most commonly used to screen developmental delays even in Brazil. 22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Although the test has not been validated for our population, an informal cultural adaptation has been carried out to make its administration easier. 24 Another advantage is the wide age group reached by this test, which makes a long-term follow-up of child develop- resulting from visual and auditory stimuli or through the manifestation of motor landmarks.…”
Section: Summary Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%