2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-79722010000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desenvolvimento, psicopatologia e apego: estudo exploratório com crianças institucionalizadas e suas cuidadoras

Abstract: ResumoO presente estudo exploratório examinou o desenvolvimento mental e a qualidade do funcionamento sócio-emocional de 16 crianças entre os 3 e os 6 anos, institucionalizadas em Centros de Acolhimento Temporário, relacionando-os com a qualidade das narrativas sobre o apego das suas cuidadoras. Foram utilizadas a Escala de Desenvolvimento Mental de Griffiths, o Questionário de Comportamentos, as Narrativas sobre o Apego e o Attachment Q-Sort. Os resultados revelaram que o nível de desenvolvimento das crianças… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw scores may be adjusted for children's chronological age and converted into a developmental quotient. The Portuguese version used in this study has been used in previous research (Cordazzo, Almeida, & Vieira, 2011;Pereira et al, 2010). In this study, Cronbach's alpha for the global scale was .98 at Time 1 and .97 at Time 2.…”
Section: Child Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Raw scores may be adjusted for children's chronological age and converted into a developmental quotient. The Portuguese version used in this study has been used in previous research (Cordazzo, Almeida, & Vieira, 2011;Pereira et al, 2010). In this study, Cronbach's alpha for the global scale was .98 at Time 1 and .97 at Time 2.…”
Section: Child Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As motivações negligência ou abandono, drogadição e abuso sexual como os principais motivos do acolhimento institucional e o período de menos de dois anos de permanência na instituição para a maioria dos participantes (São Paulo, 2004;Siqueira et al, 2006;Vitale et al, 2008;Pereira et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…There is not a consensus in literature [9][10][11][12] about the consequences of institutionalization, being it quoted as a risk or not for the development, depending many times on the historic of the child or teenager before entering the shelter, of the physical conditions of the shelter and of its commitment to the global development of the child.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%