2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-37722009000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normas brasileiras para listas de palavras associadas: associação semântica, concretude, frequência e emocionalidade

Abstract: RESUMO -O presente estudo fornece medidas normatizadas para 44 listas de palavras semanticamente associadas em português, de acordo com as seguintes dimensões: concretude, frequência, emocionalidade e associação semântica. Cada lista de palavras é composta por uma palavra-tema e 15 palavras semanticamente associadas a ela. As medidas de cada dimensão foram selecionadas de bancos de dados encontrados na literatura brasileira ou coletadas com universitários. Os resultados indicaram que os valores referentes à co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This paradigm includes 44 lists of 15 words that are semantically related to a critical word. Later, Stein and Gomes (2009) complemented the affective norms with norms of concreteness, word frequency, and semantic association. Word lists generally include mainly nouns and do not consider adjectives.…”
Section: Pleasantnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm includes 44 lists of 15 words that are semantically related to a critical word. Later, Stein and Gomes (2009) complemented the affective norms with norms of concreteness, word frequency, and semantic association. Word lists generally include mainly nouns and do not consider adjectives.…”
Section: Pleasantnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for semantically associated words allows estimation of the set of semantic associates owing to some property or linguistic relationship, providing a way to assess the knowledge on words that individuals have acquired throughout their learning history (1) . Studies have focused on the semantic association of words and have correlated it with various aspects, such as semantic categories (3,4) , syntagmatic and paradigmatic properties (5) , development and/or aging processes (6)(7)(8)(9) , semantic context (1) , semantic dementia (10) , linguistic aspects as concreteness and frequency of words (2,11,12) , memory (11,13) , etc. Free word association tasks have been widely used in the development of semantic association norms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They consist in presenting a target word to participants and asking them to produce a related word that comes to mind (2) . Two different tasks can be used: single response, in which individuals are required to produce only one response for each target word (1)(2)(3)(6)(7)(8)(9) and multiple response, in which individuals produce two or more responses in the sequence they come to mind (10,12,13) . Continuous association, or multiple response, has been criticized because it is subject to both response chaining, when the second word is generated as a function of the first word, not the target word, and retrieval inhibition, when the first word inhibits the production of other words (3,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collection of norms on words has long been used in Psychology to estimate measures like frequency of written material occurrence (Kucera & Francis, 1967;Thorndike & Lorge, 1944); semantic categories (Battig & Montague, 1969); imageability, concreteness and meaningfulness (Paivio, Yuille & Madigan, 1968); and, association to homographs (Kausler & Kollasch, 1970). There are few Brazilian databases that currently provide word association norms to the adult population: Salles et al (2008) collected norms for 88 words; Stein and Gomes (2009) described lists of words associated to 44 cues and Janczura (1996) identified associates of 69 names of everyday categories. This situation restricts the use of those verbal stimuli in the research, considering the need to control or manipulate the effect of different attributes on performance in different experimental paradigms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%