2016
DOI: 10.1590/0102-3772e32ne23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normas de Associação Livre para 1004 Palavras do Português Brasileiro

Abstract: -Association norms for 1004 Brazilian Portuguese words are presented. The free association paradigm was applied collecting the first word associated with the cue, thus avoiding response chaining and response inhibition. At least 100 participants produced the first associate of each word cue. Eight hundred seventy one undergraduates enrolled in 44 majors in public and private universities participated in the research. The norms report Forward Association Strength of all word cues and Backward Association Streng… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, certain stimulus attributes have a great impact on how likely an item is to be retrieved in a given memory task (Rubin & Friendly, 1986). In freerecall tests, participants recall more concrete words than abstract ones (Witherby & Tauber, 2017), more high-frequency words than low-frequency words (Jia et al, 2016), and more emotional words than neutral words (Johnson & MacKay, 2019).In recent years, norms for several word attributes, such as emotionality (Kristensen et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2013), concreteness (Janczura et al, 2007), and free association (Janczura et al, 2017) have been produced for Brazilian Portuguese. Norms for frequency of occurrence of words in prose texts-an indirect index of objective familiarity-are also available for Brazilian Portuguese (Núcleo Interinstitucional de Linguística Computacional [NILC], 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, certain stimulus attributes have a great impact on how likely an item is to be retrieved in a given memory task (Rubin & Friendly, 1986). In freerecall tests, participants recall more concrete words than abstract ones (Witherby & Tauber, 2017), more high-frequency words than low-frequency words (Jia et al, 2016), and more emotional words than neutral words (Johnson & MacKay, 2019).In recent years, norms for several word attributes, such as emotionality (Kristensen et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2013), concreteness (Janczura et al, 2007), and free association (Janczura et al, 2017) have been produced for Brazilian Portuguese. Norms for frequency of occurrence of words in prose texts-an indirect index of objective familiarity-are also available for Brazilian Portuguese (Núcleo Interinstitucional de Linguística Computacional [NILC], 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, norms for several word attributes, such as emotionality (Kristensen et al, 2011;Oliveira et al, 2013), concreteness (Janczura et al, 2007), and free association (Janczura et al, 2017) have been produced for Brazilian Portuguese. Norms for frequency of occurrence of words in prose texts-an indirect index of objective familiarity-are also available for Brazilian Portuguese (Núcleo Interinstitucional de Linguística Computacional [NILC], 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cada palavra dessa lista possui classificação bidimensional, valência e alerta, bem como a média e o desvio padrão para as categorias valência, alerta, concretude e frequência por milhão. Para cada categoria emocional de palavras (negativa, positiva e neutra) foram determinados a média e o desvio padrão para as categorias valência (negativa 2,66 ± 0,69; positiva 7,64 ± 0,42; neutra 5,62 ± 0,76); alerta (negativa 6,78 ± 0,88; positiva 3,45±0,87; neutra 4,66±0,96); concretude (negativa 3,73 ± 1,43; positiva 3,81 ± 1,57; neutra 3,85 ± 0,94) e frequência por milhão no corpus do Núcleo Interinstitucional de Linguística Computacional -NILC (negativa 1186,51 ± 2110,32; positiva 1330,19 ± 0,42; neutra 1367,52 ± 1639,72 (Janczura et al, 2007;Janczura, Castilho, & Oliveira, 2016a;Janczura, Castilho, Keller, & Oliveira, 2016b). Os dados podem ser vistos na Figura 1.…”
Section: Palavrasunclassified
“…A frequência de ocorrência variou de 1 a 78.264 (amplitude = 78.263). Esses valores indicam que a amostra incluiu palavras relaxantes, neutras ou alertantes (fator alerta); palavras negativas, neutras ou positivas emocionalmente (fator valência); palavras julgadas como mais concretas até mais abstratas; e palavras de diferentes frequências de ocorrência na língua portuguesa, ou seja, desde raras até muito frequentes (Janczura et al, 2007;Janczura et al, 2016a;Janczura et al, 2016b ). Para a etapa de teste, foram escolhidas 80 palavras de valência negativa, 80 de valência positiva e 80 de valência neutra, totalizando 240 palavras.…”
Section: Palavrasunclassified