2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612009000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Revisitando a função de reação fiscal no Brasil pós-Real: uma abordagem de mudanças de regime

Abstract: Resumo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
8
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is to say that, given the value of GDP, a debt increase of 1% of GDP increases the primary surplus in 0.0527% to 0.0624% of GDP. These are different from the values estimated by Mendonça et al (2009), De Mello (2008) and Luporini (2015), but these authors considered different samples, none of them contemplating the period after 2012.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is to say that, given the value of GDP, a debt increase of 1% of GDP increases the primary surplus in 0.0527% to 0.0624% of GDP. These are different from the values estimated by Mendonça et al (2009), De Mello (2008) and Luporini (2015), but these authors considered different samples, none of them contemplating the period after 2012.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Among the works on fiscal reaction, besides Bohn (1998), we can highlight Canzoneri (2001), Fincke and Greiner (2011), and, for the Brazilian case, Lima and Simonassi (2005), Mendonça et al (2009), Cavalcanti and Silva (2010), De Mello (2008) and Luporini (2015). 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is indication of a change in the fiscal regime after 2000. These results are in line with those obtained by de Mello (2005) and by Mendonça, Santos and Sachsida (2009). More recently, using dummy variables in the analysis of fiscal reaction functions for Brazil, Simonassi (2013) 2.0 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 2 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 8 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6 2 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 As previously discussed, stabilizing the debt-income ratio requires that the fiscal reaction parameter overcome the positive difference between the real rate of return paid on government securities and the economy´s growth rate.…”
Section: B) Fiscal Reaction Over Timesupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A fiscal reaction function checks whether the government´s behavior has been sufficiently "responsive" to increments in the debt. Luporini (2002), De Mello (2005), Lima and Simonassi (2005), and more recently, Mendonça , Santos and Sachsida (2009) and Simonassi (2013) have estimated fiscal reaction functions for Brazil. Mendonça, Santos and Sachsida, used a Markov switching model over the period [1995][1996][1997][1998][1999][2000][2001][2002][2003][2004][2005][2006][2007] and found that Brazilian fiscal policy was more responsive to accumulating debt prior to the year 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%