2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-75902012000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Para uma crítica ao discurso da inovação: saber e controle no caPitalismo do conhecimento introdução Criatividade e inovação são palavras pronunciadas à exaustão no meio organizacional contemporâ-neo, a ponto de um estudioso da área concluir que as organizações ocidentais estão vivendo o fenô-meno da neofilia, o culto ao novo (SieverS, 2007, p. 1 tividade, empreendedorismo são hoje palavras de ordem dentro das grandes corporações e também, em boa medida, fora delas" (López-ruiz, 2007, p. 70).O tema da mudança … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To Schumpeter (1934), technological change drives development, revolutionizing the economic structure in a process of new combinations which explains the economic cycles (DOSI, 1984;FREEMAN;SOETE, 1997;WINTER, 1977WINTER, , 1982ROSENBERG, 1982;SCHUMPETER, 1934). Innovation plays a key role in this context, acting as a "creative destruction" of products and markets (SCHUMPETER, 1934) and functioning as a trend in which its positive effects usually stand out from the negatives (FONTENELLE, 2012 To Rogers (2003, p. 442-446), 'Desirable Consequences' are "the functional effects of an innovation to an individual or to a social system"; while 'Undesirable Consequences' are "the dysfunctional effects of an innovation to an individual or to a social system." The author also explains that 'Direct Consequences' are "the changes to an individual or a social system that occur in immediate response to an innovation" while 'Indirect Consequences' are "the changes to an individual or a social system that occur as a result of the direct consequences of an innovation".…”
Section: Consequences Of Innovation Adoption and Stakeholders' Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To Schumpeter (1934), technological change drives development, revolutionizing the economic structure in a process of new combinations which explains the economic cycles (DOSI, 1984;FREEMAN;SOETE, 1997;WINTER, 1977WINTER, , 1982ROSENBERG, 1982;SCHUMPETER, 1934). Innovation plays a key role in this context, acting as a "creative destruction" of products and markets (SCHUMPETER, 1934) and functioning as a trend in which its positive effects usually stand out from the negatives (FONTENELLE, 2012 To Rogers (2003, p. 442-446), 'Desirable Consequences' are "the functional effects of an innovation to an individual or to a social system"; while 'Undesirable Consequences' are "the dysfunctional effects of an innovation to an individual or to a social system." The author also explains that 'Direct Consequences' are "the changes to an individual or a social system that occur in immediate response to an innovation" while 'Indirect Consequences' are "the changes to an individual or a social system that occur as a result of the direct consequences of an innovation".…”
Section: Consequences Of Innovation Adoption and Stakeholders' Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies that address the implications of adopting innovations are rare, with a predilection for studies that address the positive aspects of these innovations, with some exceptions that focus only on the negative aspects (ABRAHAMSON, 1991;FONTENELLE, 2012;TARAFDAR;GUPTA;TUREL, 2015). In this regard, the understanding of the phenomenon in all its amplitude can contribute to give voice to minorities, forgotten or neglected groups, which is particularly important regarding the actual context where governments are trying to use public sector innovation to solve complex problems TUMMERS, 2016;KARO;KATTEL, 2016;KATTEL et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonaka e Takeuchi (1997) explicam que o conhecimento tácito é algo do ser humano, que é intransferível, presente entre o corpo e alma. Assim o sendo, concordando com os críticos à GC, não se poderia fazer gestão de algo que não se tem controle, partindo do pressuposto que fazer gestão é exercer controle, foi dado o nome de "gestão do conhecimento", na tentativa de encontrar meios de acesso e controle ao saber humano (FONTENELLE, 2012). Eis aqui o ponto nevrálgico desse modo capitalista contemporâneo de gestão.…”
Section: Crítica à Gestão Do Conhecimentounclassified
“…gilância contínua. Já as sociedades de controle reconhecem que o mundo é inconsistente, complexo, paradoxal, confuso e, por consequência, exigente de um novo gerencialismo, marcado por um controle de curto prazo, de rotação rápida, contínuo e ilimitado (Deleuze, 1992;Fontenelle, 2012). O que importa para o neocolonialismo não é a dominação como causa, mas o controle por meio de dispositivos culturais que, por alterarem-se constantemente com o passar do tempo, tentam viabilizar o contínuo acesso às mais diversas sociedades (Cameron & Palan, 2004;Kelly, 1999).…”
Section: Temática: Do Colonialismo Ao Neocolonialismounclassified