Os Congressos Brasileiros de Ciências Sociais e Humanas em Saúde da Abrasco: um campo científico em disputa

Abstract

Os Congressos Brasileiros de Ciências Sociais e Humanas em Saúde da Abrasco: um campo científico em disputaThe Brazilian Congresses of Social and Human Sciences in Health of Abrasco: a scientific field in disputeResumo Atualmente, no Brasil, configura-

A construção do campo da Saúde Coletiva e as políticas de saúde - Contribuições da Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva

“…The reviewed papers' analysis allows us to conclude that the Journal opened space for reflexivity on CH. Thus, investigating CH's meaning, its relationships with Public Health, its specificities, and overlaps with other disciplines were themed 13,14,66 .…”

“…In Brazil, this theme was developed mainly within CH, originated in the 1970s, and it also incorporates this dual dimension, which can be understood as a field of knowledge and scope of practice [4][5][6] . Although CH has been investigated under different approaches, there is a reasonable consensus on the appropriateness of using the field approach, in the sense of Bourdieu, to interpret it 5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] .…”

HIV/AIDS: sexualidades, subjetividades e políticas

“…A publicação resulta de um esforço colaborativo envolvendo as seguintes instituições: O Congresso, cuja primeira edição data de 1995, integra a pauta das ações e dos propósitos da Comissão Ciências Humanas e Sociais em Saúde da referida associação. Trata-se de um espaço singular de reafirmação e ampliação do sentido da Saúde Coletiva, enquanto saber e prática originada pelo pensamento crítico latino-americano, protagonizado por profissionais da saúde e cientistas sociais e norteado pelo olhar sócio-histórico da medicina e do cuidado, expressando, assim, os interesses coletivos dos atores do campo (Nunes, 2005;Ianni et al, 2015).…”

The 8th Brazilian Congress of Social and Human Sciences in Health: continuity, convergence and coherence

“…These congresses sometimes express the concentration of scientific production in the South-Southeast axis (IANNI et al, 2015), sometimes the regional capillarity of the Social and Human Sciences in Health (TRAD, 2012), so that one of the achievements of the 8th Congress concerns precisely the fact that the vast majority of its thematic groups (WGs) -27 of 29 -were multi-regional, ie most WGs were coordinated by people linked to institutions located in at least two of the five regions of Brazil, including North, Northeast and Midwest. The regional diversity of the WGs is in line with the very configuration of the Committee on Social and Human Health Sciences, unique to Abrasco's three committees -the other two being Epidemiology and Politics, Planning and Management -with representatives from universities in the five country regions.…”