2016
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20141779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Forage yield, rate of CO 2 assimilation, and quality of temperate annual forage species grown under artificial shading conditions

Abstract: In this study, it was evaluated the effect of shade on forage yield, rate of CO 2 assimilation, and the quality of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) cv. 'BRS Ponteio' and black oat (Avena strigosaSchreb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high shading intensity in this study site (75.9% on average) and a period of low water availability during the white oat growing season, the average DM (1,690 kg/ha) was higher than that obtained by Soares et al. (2016) who reported an yield of 1,324 kg/ha of DM under 50% shading conditions and no water restriction. The high shading intensity at all cultivation positions and soil clay content (31%) may have minimized effects of low water availability during crop cycle by appropriate maintenance of soil moisture for a longer period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Despite the high shading intensity in this study site (75.9% on average) and a period of low water availability during the white oat growing season, the average DM (1,690 kg/ha) was higher than that obtained by Soares et al. (2016) who reported an yield of 1,324 kg/ha of DM under 50% shading conditions and no water restriction. The high shading intensity at all cultivation positions and soil clay content (31%) may have minimized effects of low water availability during crop cycle by appropriate maintenance of soil moisture for a longer period.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Soares et al (2016) andPiazzetta et al (2009) who found 21.1% in black oat. Similar to those observed byMeinerz et al (2011) with mean values after three cuts of 22.42 and 21.24% for common black oat and Ta wheat, respectively, and 19.63% for S rye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%