2016
DOI: 10.1590/0100-5405/2119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of cotton genotypes to the incidence of Alternaria leaf spot

Abstract: In field experiments and under natural occurrence of the pathogen, 18 cotton genotypes, comprising cultivars and lineages, were evaluated for their reaction to Alternaria leaf spot caused by Alternaria macrospora Zimm. High genetic diversity of resistance to the pathogen was observed, and four groups of reaction to the disease were detected in the environment where the disease showed greater intensity. Differences in the phenotypic stability of resistance were also found, and there were stable genotypes, i.e. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study and also previous studies (Hosagoudar 2007;Anil 2013;Cia et al, 2016), none of the cotton genotypes were identified as immune to Alternaria leaf blight whereas several Pima cotton cultivars were evaluated for resistance to Alternaria leaf blight, based on disease severity rating, lesion size and numbers and Pima was found to be more susceptible (Zhu et al, 2018). Similarly, Chattannavar et al (2009b) screened 196 cotton cultivars under field conditions for resistance to Alternaria blight during the kharif season of June 2007.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In this study and also previous studies (Hosagoudar 2007;Anil 2013;Cia et al, 2016), none of the cotton genotypes were identified as immune to Alternaria leaf blight whereas several Pima cotton cultivars were evaluated for resistance to Alternaria leaf blight, based on disease severity rating, lesion size and numbers and Pima was found to be more susceptible (Zhu et al, 2018). Similarly, Chattannavar et al (2009b) screened 196 cotton cultivars under field conditions for resistance to Alternaria blight during the kharif season of June 2007.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Twenty F 1 hybrid combinations generated from partial diallel crossing were used for this study using two parents groups: GI -formed by five cultivars with high fiber yield (Cia et al 2014, Carvalho et al 2015, Coutinho et al 2015, Zonta et al 2016) and GII -composed of by four drought tolerance cultivars (Freire et al 1999, Vidal Neto andFreire 2013). These cultivars are inbred lines developed by Brazilian Company of Agricultural Research (Embrapa), Bayer and Mato Grosso Foundation (FMT) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty full-sib F 1 hybrid combinations from a partial diallel cross were used. The cultivars used as parents were divided into two groups (Table 1): GI, formed by five cultivars with high fiber yield (Cia et al, 2014;Carvalho et al, 2015;Coutinho et al, 2015;Zonta et al, 2016); and GII, formed by four cultivars adapted to the Semiarid region of Northeast of Brazil, except CNPA-ITA-90, which is tolerant to water stress in the Cerrado region of Brazil (Freire et al, 1999;Vidal Neto & Freire, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%