Disclaimer The EAC Guidelines represent the views of the EAC, and were produced after careful consideration of the scientific and medical knowledge, and the evidence available at the time of their publication. The EAC is not responsible in the event of any contradiction, discrepancy, and/or ambiguity between the EAC Guidelines and any other official recommendations or guidelines issued by the relevant public health authorities, in particular in relation to good use of healthcare or therapeutic strategies. Health professionals are encouraged to take the EAC Guidelines fully into account when exercising their clinical judgment, as well as in the determination and the implementation of preventive, diagnostic, or therapeutic medical strategies; however, the EAC Guidelines do not override, in any way whatsoever, the individual responsibility of health professionals to make appropriate and accurate decisions in consideration of each patient’s health condition and in consultation with that patient and, where appropriate and/or necessary, the patient’s caregiver. Nor do the EAC Guidelines exempt health professionals from taking into full and careful consideration the relevant official updated recommendations or guidelines issued by the competent public health authorities, in order to manage each patient’s case in light of the scientifically accepted data pursuant to their respective ethical and professional obligations. It is also the health professional’s responsibility to verify the applicable rules and regulations relating to drugs and medical devices at the time of prescription.
Objective: to analyze the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of classical carotid endarterectomy (CEE) in extended atherosclerotic lesions in comparison with the outcomes of this operation in local atherosclerotic plaque (AP). Materials and Methods. This study, which lasted from January 2010 to December 2020, included 148 patients with extended AP and hemodynamically significant internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The term “extended” was understood as a hemodynamically significant lesion ≥ 5 cm long. These patients made up Group 1. Group 2 was formed over the same period of time from 632 patients with hemodynamically significant stenosis <5 cm long. In both cohorts, CEE with repair of the reconstruction zone with a diepoxide-treated xenopericardial patch was performed. Long-term follow-up was 71.4 ± 45.6 months. Results. The groups were comparable in terms of frequency of in-hospital complications: death (group 1: 0.67%, n = 1; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.74; OR = 1.42; 95% Cl 0.14-13.6), myocardial infarction (MI) (group 1: 0.67%, n = 1; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.74; OR = 1.42; 95% CI 0.14-13.6), ischemic stroke (group 1: 0%; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.91; OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.03-11.8), combined endpoint (death + MI + stroke) (group 1: 1.35%, n = 2; group 2: 1.4%, n = 9; p = 0.74; OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.2-4.43). The groups were also comparable in terms of frequency of long-term complications: death (group 1: 2.0%, n = 3; group 2: 2.05%, n = 13; p = 0.76; OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.27-3.5), MI (group 1: 2.7%, n = 4; group 2: 2.4%, n = 15; p = 0.95; OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.37-3.49), ischemic stroke (group 1: 5.4%, n = 8; group 2: 5.2%, n = 33; p = 0.9; OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.46-2.29), ICA occlusion and restenosis (group 1: 12.8%, n = 19; group 2: 13.3%, n = 84; p = 0.99; OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.56-1.63), combined endpoint (death + MI + stroke) (group 1: 10.1%, n = 15; group 2: 9.6%, n = 61; p = 0.98; OR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.58-1.91). Analysis of survival graphs revealed no significant intergroup differences for all types of complications (lethal outcome: p = 0.56; MI: p = 0.73; stroke/mini-stroke: p = 0.89; ICA restenosis/occlusion: p = 0.82; combined end point: p = 0.71). Their increase was uniform in both groups. However, more than half of all ICA restenoses and occlusions were visualized in the first 6 months after CEE. Conclusion. Implantation of a long patch (≥ 5 cm) is not characterized by increased incidence of restenosis and all adverse cardiovascular events during in-hospital and long-term follow-up.
The article describes a computer modeling technique that allows predicting the development of restenosis of the internal carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy (CEE). A clinical case has been demonstrated that proves the effectiveness of the developed method. It is indicated that for the correct formation of the geometric model, data from multispiral computed tomography with angiography of the patient after CEE with a layer thickness of 0.6 mm and a current of 355 mA are required. To build a flow model, data of color duplex scanning in three sections are required: 1. In the proximal section of the common carotid artery (3 cm proximal to the bifurcation); 2. In the section of the external carotid artery, 2 cm distal to the carotid sinus; 3. In the section of the internal carotid artery, 2 cm distal to the carotid sinus. The result of computer calculations using specialized software (Sim Vascular, Python, Open Foam) is a mathematical model of blood flow in a vessel. It is an array of calculated data describing the speed and other characteristics of the flow at each point of the artery. Based on the analysis of RRT and TAWSS indicators, a computer model of bifurcation is formed, which makes it possible to predict areas of increased risk of restenosis development. Thus, the developed technique is able to identify a cohort of patients after CEE, subjected to a high probability of loss of the vessel lumen. Such an opportunity will provide a more precise supervision of these patients in the postoperative period with the aim of early diagnosis of restenosis and timely prevention of the development of adverse cardiovascular events.
Изучение госпитальных результатов экстренной каротидной эндартерэктомии (КЭЭ) и каротидной ангиопластики со стентированием (КАС) в острейшем периоде острого нарушения мозгового кровообращения (ОНМК). МАТеРИАЛ И МеТОдыC января 2008 по август 2020 г. в исследование вошли 615 пациентов с гемодинамически значимыми стенозами внутренних сонных артерий (ВСА), оперированными в острейшем периоде ишемического инсульта (в течение 3 суток от дебюта ОНМК). В зависимости от реализованного вида реваскуляризации все больные были распределены на две группы: 1-я группа -КАС (n=312); 2-я группа -КЭЭ (n=357). Критериями включения стали: 1. Неврологические нарушения легкой степени: от 3 до 8 баллов по шкале NIHSS; не более 2 баллов по модификационной шкале Рэнкина; более 61 балла по шкале Бартел; 2. Показания для КЭЭ/КАС согласно действующим национальным рекомендациям; 3. Ишемический очаг в головном мозге не более 2,5 см в диаметре.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.