Systematic autopsy and comprehensive pathological analyses of COVID-19 decedents should provide insights into the disease characteristics and facilitate the development of novel therapeutics. In this study, we report the autopsy findings from the lungs and lymphatic organs of twelve COVID-19 decedents that evaluated histopathological changes, immune cell signature, and inflammatory factor expression in the lungs, spleen, and lymph nodes. Here we show that the major pulmonary alternations included diffuse alveolar damage, interstitial fibrosis, and exudative inflammation featured with extensive serous and fibrin exudates, macrophage infiltration, and abundant production of inflammatory factors (IL-6, IP-10, TNFα and IL-1β). The spleen and hilar lymph nodes contained lesions with tissue structure disruption and immune cell dysregulation, including lymphopenia and macrophage accumulation. These findings provide pathological evidence that links injuries of the lungs and lymphatic organs with the fatal systematic respiratory and immune malfunction in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Objective To confirm feasibility and assess intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) to differentiate active sacroiliitis and ankylosing spondylitis.. Methods Forty-one patients were divided into two groups, an active group (n=20) and a chronic group (n=21), according to the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and laboratory parameters. In addition, 21 healthy volunteers were chosen as the control group. Tissue diffusivity (D slow ), perfusion fraction (f), and pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D fast ) values were obtained for all three groups. Oneway analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed for all parameters. Results There was good interobserver agreement on the measurements between the two observers. The optimal cutoff values (with respective AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio) between active and chronic groups were D slow =0.53×10 −3 mm 2 /s (0.976, 90 %, 95.2 %, 18.9, 0.10) and f= 0. 09 (0.545, 20 %, 95.5 %, 4.2, 0.84), and between chronic and control groups were D slow = 0.22 × 10 −3 mm 2 /s (0.517, 9.52 %, 100 %, no number, 0.9) and f = 0.09 (0.935, 95.24 %, 80.95 %, 5, 0.059).Conclusion D slow and f of IVIM diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in AS show a significant difference in the values of diffusion of water molecules and fractional perfusion-related volume among the three groups. Key Points• D slow can be used to differentiate the activity of AS.• With perfusion fraction, the sensitivity of differentiating the AS activity is improved. • IVIM DWI plays an important role in detecting the activity in patients with AS.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (TB) for prostate cancer (PCa) in biopsy-naïve men. Materials and Methods: Own control studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 2018 were identified via a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library. We pooled relative sensitivity (or risk ratio [RR]) to compare diagnostic efficiency for PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) between TB and systematic biopsy (SB). The independent role of either biopsy pathway was evaluated for participants with positive/negative MRI. Results: Thirty-one studies consisting of 25 own control studies and 6 RCTs were included. We identified 4,020 biopsy-naïve men with positive MRI who underwent two biopsies concurrently, with PCa/csPCa detection rates of 65.90 and 45.13%, respectively. TB and SB did not differ in the detection of any PCa (RR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-1.05). However, TB detected more csPCa (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.30) and more PCa with a Gleason score ≥3+4 (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.07-1.34). Using a combined test as a reference, omitting SB resulted in detecting 12.81% less csPCa and 20.76% less clinically insignificant PCa (cinsPCa), and omitting TB resulted in detecting 25.69% less csPCa and 10.8% more cinsPCa. For patients with negative MRI, omitting SB led to underdetection of 30.29% of any PCa (10.9% of csPCa). Conclusions: Combining TB and SB increased the diagnostic accuracy of csPCa for biopsy-naïve men with positive MRI, and omitting SB for patients with a negative MRI would lead to the underdetection of nearly 10% of csPCa.

We report a 52-year-old female patient with a 2-year history of local neck pain, decreased cervical spine rotation, progressive numbness and weakness of both arms. Preoperative, dynamic X-rays, computed tomography, three-dimensional computed tomography demonstrated a displaced Os odontoideum with irreducible Subluxation of C1/2. We used a single transoral approach release, reduction using an assistance of skull traction, bone fusion and stabilization in the treatment of Os odontoideum with irreducible alantoaxial dislocation. Postoperative, the patient was free of all symptoms and X-rays taken showed a stable fusion of C1/2 at 6th postoperative month. This technique in the treatment of Os odontoideum with irreducible alantoaxial dislocation is atraumatic and effective. And preoperative dynamic X-rays, computed tomography, three-dimensional computed tomography and MRI scans provided an invaluable aid to select this operative procedure.

Background Lung ultrasound (LUS) can be an important imaging tool for the diagnosis and assessment of lung involvement. Ultrasound sonograms have been confirmed to illustrate damage to a person’s lungs, which means that the correct classification and scoring of a patient’s sonogram can be used to assess lung involvement. Methods The purpose of this study was to establish a lung involvement assessment model based on deep learning. A novel multimodal channel and receptive field attention network combined with ResNeXt (MCRFNet) was proposed to classify sonograms, and the network can automatically fuse shallow features and determine the importance of different channels and respective fields. Finally, sonogram classes were transformed into scores to evaluate lung involvement from the initial diagnosis to rehabilitation. Results and conclusion Using multicenter and multimodal ultrasound data from 104 patients, the diagnostic model achieved 94.39% accuracy, 82.28% precision, 76.27% sensitivity, and 96.44% specificity. The lung involvement severity and the trend of COVID-19 pneumonia were evaluated quantitatively.

PurposeTo determine whether additional systematic biopsy is necessary in all biopsy naïve patients with MRI visible lesions by taking PI-RADS score and prostate volume into consideration.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent combined systematic biopsy (SB) and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy (TB) in our hospital between May 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate of clinical significant prostate cancer (csPCa), biopsy grade group (GG) concordance, and disease upgrading rate on radical prostatectomy were compared between SB and TB and further stratified by PI-RADS v2.0 category and prostate volume.ResultsA total of 234 patients were analyzed in this study. TB alone detected more csPCa and less clinically insignificant prostate cancer (cisPCa) than SB alone in the whole cohort (57.3 vs 53%, P = 0.041; 3.8 vs 7.7%, P = 0.049 respectively). The additional SB indicated only a marginal increase of csPCa detection but a remarkable increase of cisPCa detection compared with targeted biopsy (59.4 vs 57.3%, P = 0.064; 3.8 vs 7.7%, P = 0.012). As stratified by PI-RADS category, the difference of csPCa detection rate between TB and SB was not significant either in PI-RADS 5 subgroup (83.8 vs 76.3%, P = 0.07) or in PI-RADS 3–4 subgroup (43.5 vs 40.9%, P = 1.0). Additional SB decreased the rate of disease upgrading on radical prostatectomy (RP) than TB alone in PI-RADS 3–4 subgroup (14.5 vs 25.5%, P = 0.031) other than PI-RADS 5 subgroup (6 vs 6%, P = 1.0). When stratified by prostate volume (PV), TB alone detected more csPCa than SB in small prostate (PV < 30 ml) group (81.0 vs 71.0%, P = 0.021) but not in large prostate (PV ≥ 30 ml) group (44.0 vs 42.7%, P = 0.754). The additional SB did not significantly decrease the rate of disease upgrading on RP than TB alone in either small or large prostate (6.4 vs 8.5%, P = 1.0; 13.8 vs 22.4%, P = 0.063).ConclusionThe combination biopsy method was no superior than targeted biopsy alone in PI-RADS 5 or in small volume prostate subgroup.