Analyses that maximized the likelihood of the data above the LOQ and treated BQL data as censored provided the most accurate and precise parameter estimates.

In pharmacokinetic data analysis, it is frequently necessary to select the number of exponential terms in a polyexponential expression used to describe the concentration-time relationship. The performance characteristics of several selection criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and the Schwarz Criterion (SC), and the F test (alpha = 0.05), were examined using Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, the ability of these criteria to select the correct model, to select a model allowing estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters with small bias and good precision, and to select a model allowing precise predictions of concentration was evaluated. To some extent interrelationships among these procedures is explainable. Results indicate that the F test tends to choose the simpler model more often than does either the AIC or SC, even when the more complex model is correct. Also, the F test is more sensitive to deficient sampling designs. Clearance estimates are generally very robust to the choice of the wrong model. Other pharmacokinetic parameters are more sensitive to model choice, particularly the apparent elimination rate constant. Prediction of concentrations is generally more precise when the correct model is chosen. The tendency for the F test (alpha = 0.05) to choose the simpler model must be considered relative to the objectives of the study.

No abstract

Population pharmacokinetics (PK) of FVIII activity-time profiles following recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) dosing were evaluated in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (from two clinical trials). Potential covariates that may be determinants of variability in FVIII activity were identified. A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK of both compounds. von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentration was the major covariate for rFVIIIFc clearance, reflecting its protective role in FVIII activity clearance. The effect of body weight and hematocrit on the central volume of distribution of rFVIIIFc was minor. The results of these analyses confirmed that rFVIIIFc clearance (1.65 dL/h) is much lower than that of rFVIII (2.53 dL/h), while the steady state volumes of distribution were similar. The strong positive correlations between the PK parameters of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII suggest that individuals who have high time-related PK characteristics with rFVIII are likely to have comparable characteristics with rFVIIIFc. Steady-state activity-time profiles for selected rFVIIIFc dosing regimens were simulated accounting for uncertainty in model parameters. These population PK analyses and simulations provide a comprehensive characterization of the PK of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII and may be useful for designing dosing regimens.