Key Points A novel recombinant factor VIII with prolonged half-life, rFVIIIFc, was developed to reduce prophylactic injection frequency. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated in patients with severe hemophilia A, and resulted in low bleeding rates when dosed 1 to 2 times per week.
Summary. Background: Prophylactic factor replacement, which prevents hemarthroses and thereby reduces the musculoskeletal disease burden in children with hemophilia A, requires frequent intravenous infusions (three to four times weekly). Objective: Kids A-LONG was a phase 3 open-label study evaluating the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a longer-acting factor, recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), in previously treated children with severe hemophilia A (endogenous FVIII level of < 1 IU dL ) and dosing interval (≥ 2 days) were adjusted as needed. A subset of subjects had sequential pharmacokinetic evaluations of FVIII and rFVIIIFc. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, annualized bleeding rate (ABR), and number of infusions required to control a bleed. Results: No subject developed an inhibitor to rFVIIIFc. Adverse events were typical of a pediatric hemophilic population. The rFVIIIFc half-life was prolonged relative to that of FVIII, consistent with observations in adults and adolescents. The median ABR was 1.96 overall, and 0.00 for spontaneous bleeds; 46.4% of subjects reported no bleeding episodes on study. Ninetythree per cent of bleeding episodes were controlled with one to two infusions. The median average weekly rFVIIIFc prophylactic dose was 88.11 IU kg À1. At study end, 62 of 69 subjects (90%) were infusing twice weekly. Among subjects who had been previously receiving FVIII prophylaxis, 74% reduced their dosing frequency with rFVIIIFc. Conclusion: Twice-weekly infusions with rFVIIIFc were well tolerated and yielded low bleeding rates in children with severe hemophilia A.
Population pharmacokinetics (PK) of FVIII activity-time profiles following recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) and recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) dosing were evaluated in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A (from two clinical trials). Potential covariates that may be determinants of variability in FVIII activity were identified. A 2-compartment model adequately described the PK of both compounds. von Willebrand Factor (VWF) concentration was the major covariate for rFVIIIFc clearance, reflecting its protective role in FVIII activity clearance. The effect of body weight and hematocrit on the central volume of distribution of rFVIIIFc was minor. The results of these analyses confirmed that rFVIIIFc clearance (1.65 dL/h) is much lower than that of rFVIII (2.53 dL/h), while the steady state volumes of distribution were similar. The strong positive correlations between the PK parameters of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII suggest that individuals who have high time-related PK characteristics with rFVIII are likely to have comparable characteristics with rFVIIIFc. Steady-state activity-time profiles for selected rFVIIIFc dosing regimens were simulated accounting for uncertainty in model parameters. These population PK analyses and simulations provide a comprehensive characterization of the PK of rFVIIIFc and rFVIII and may be useful for designing dosing regimens.
Summary. Background: Routine prophylaxis with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) -the standard of care for severe hemophilia A -often requires frequent intravenous infusions (three or four times weekly). An FVIII molecule with an extended half-life could reduce infusion frequency. The A-LONG study established the safety, efficacy and prolonged pharmacokinetics of recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in previously treated adolescents and adults with severe hemophilia A. Objective: In this post hoc analysis, we investigated the relationship between subjects' prestudy (FVIII) and on-study (rFVIIIFc) regimens. Methods: We analyzed two subgroups of subjects: prior prophylaxis and on-study individualized prophylaxis (n = 80), and prior episodic treatment and on-study weekly prophylaxis (n = 16). Subjects' prestudy dosing regimens and bleeding rates were compared with their final rFVIIIFc regimens and annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) in the last 3 months on-study. Dosing regimen simulations based on population pharmacokinetics models for rFVIII and rFVIIIFc were performed. Results: As compared with their prestudy regimen, 79 of 80 (98.8%) subjects on individualized rFVIIIFc prophylaxis decreased their infusion frequency. Overall ABRs were low, with comparable factor consumption. Longer dosing intervals, including 5-day dosing, were associated with higher baseline von Willebrand factor antigen levels. Simulated dosing regimens predicted a greater proportion of subjects with steady-state FVIII activity trough levels of ≥ 1 IU dL À1 (1%) with rFVIIIFc than with equivalent rFVIII regimens. Conclusion: These results suggest that patients on rFVIIIFc prophylaxis can reduce their infusion frequency as compared with their prior FVIII regimen while maintaining low bleeding rates, affording more patients trough levels of ≥ 1 IU dL À1 than with rFVIII products requiring more frequent dosing regimens.
More effective and better-tolerated therapies are needed for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Among the direct-acting anti-HCV agents in development is the nonstructural 5B protein (NS5B polymerase) non-nucleoside inhibitor filibuvir. We investigated the antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of multiple doses of filibuvir in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients who were chronically infected with HCV genotype 1 in two phase 1b clinical studies (study 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled dose escalation study and study 2 was a nonrandomized, open-label study). The filibuvir doses evaluated ranged from 200-1400 mg daily, and the duration of dosing ranged from 3-10 days. Genotypic changes in the NS5B nucleotide sequence following short-term filibuvir therapy were also assessed. Filibuvir potently inhibited viral replication in a dose-dependent manner. Mean maximum HCV RNA change from baseline ranged from 20.97 log 10 IU/mL with filibuvir given at 100 mg twice daily to 22.30 log 10 IU/mL with filibuvir given at 700 mg twice daily in treatment-naive patients. In treatmentexperienced patients, an HCV RNA reduction of 2.20 log 10 IU/mL was achieved with filibuvir given at 450 mg twice daily. Filibuvir was well tolerated in both studies. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No discontinuations, serious adverse events, or deaths were reported. NS5B sequencing identified residue 423 as the predominant site of mutation after filibuvir dosing. Conclusion: Filibuvir administration resulted in significant reductions in HCV RNA concentrations at doses that were well tolerated in patients infected with HCV genotype 1. Filibuvir is currently being evaluated in combination with pegylated interferon alfa 2a plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;54:50-59) H epatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects approximately 180 million people worldwide 1 and is a leading cause of chronic liver disease. 2 The current standard of care for chronic HCV infection is a combination of pegylated interferon alfa (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV). 3 In treatment-naive patients who are infected with HCV genotype 1, administration of pegIFN and RBV results in a sustained virological response (SVR; defined as undetectable HCV RNA in the plasma 24 weeks after completion of therapy) in only 40%-50% of patients following 48 weeks of therapy. [4][5][6] In patients with genotype 1 infection who failed to achieve SVR with a prior pegIFN/RBV regimen, retreatment with pegIFN and RBV for 48 weeks resulted in SVR rates ranging from 4% in nonresponders (did not achieve undetectable HCV RNA levels at any time during therapy) to 23% in relapsers (HCV RNA undetectable at end of treatment but returned following discontinuation of treatment). 7 PegIFN and RBV therapy is also associated with substantial side effects, including fatigue,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.