Key Points A novel recombinant factor VIII with prolonged half-life, rFVIIIFc, was developed to reduce prophylactic injection frequency. rFVIIIFc was well-tolerated in patients with severe hemophilia A, and resulted in low bleeding rates when dosed 1 to 2 times per week.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer 's disease is a progressive, irreversible, and fatal disease for which accumulation of amyloid beta is thought to play a key role in pathogenesis. Aducanumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against aggregated soluble and insoluble forms of amyloid beta. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of aducanumab in early Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: EMERGE and ENGAGE were two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global, phase 3 studies of aducanumab in patients with early Alzheimer's disease. SETTING: These studies involved 348 sites in 20 countries. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 1638 (EMERGE) and 1647 (ENGAGE) patients (aged 50-85 years, confirmed amyloid pathology) who met clinical criteria for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease or mild Alzheimer's disease dementia, of which 1812 (55.2%) completed the study. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive aducanumab low dose (3 or 6 mg/kg target dose), high dose (10 mg/kg target dose), or placebo via IV infusion once every 4 weeks over 76 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 78 on the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), an integrated scale that assesses both function and cognition. Other measures included safety assessments; secondary and tertiary clinical outcomes that assessed cognition, function, and behavior; and biomarker endpoints. RESULTS: EMERGE and ENGAGE were halted based on futility analysis of data pooled from the first approximately 50% of enrolled patients; subsequent efficacy analyses included data from a larger data set collected up to futility declaration and followed prespecified statistical analyses. The primary endpoint was met in EMERGE (difference of −0.39 for highdose aducanumab vs placebo [95% CI, −0.69 to −0.09; P=.012; 22% decrease]) but not in ENGAGE (difference of 0.03, [95% CI, −0.26 to 0.33; P=.833; 2% increase]). Results of biomarker substudies confirmed target engagement and dose-dependent reduction in markers of Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. The most common adverse event was amyloid-related imaging abnormalities-edema. CONCLUSIONS: Data from EMERGE demonstrated a statistically significant change across all four primary and secondary clinical endpoints. ENGAGE did not meet its primary or secondary endpoints. A dose-and time-dependent reduction in pathophysiological markers of Alzheimer 's disease was observed in both trials.

No abstract

No abstract

This review summarizes the most recent developments in and applications of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling methodology originating from both the pharmaceutical and environmental toxicology areas. It focuses on works published in the last 5 years, although older seminal papers have also been referenced. After a brief introduction to the field and several essential definitions, the main body of the text is structured to follow the major steps of a typical PBPK modeling exercise. Various applications of the methodology are briefly described. The major future trends and perspectives are outlined. The main conclusion from the review of the available literature is that PBPK modeling, despite its obvious potential and recent incremental developments, has not taken the place it deserves, especially in pharmaceutical and drug development sciences.

The aim of the current review is to summarise the present status of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling and its applications in drug research, and thus serve as a reference point to people interested in the methodology. The review is structured into three major sections. The first discusses the existing methodologies and techniques of PBPK model development. The second describes some of the most interesting PBPK model implementations published. The final section is devoted to a discussion of the current limitations and the possible future developments of the PBPK modelling approach. The current review is focused on papers dealing with the pharmacokinetics and/or toxicokinetics of medicinal compounds; references discussing PBPK models of environmental compounds are mentioned only if they represent considerable methodological developments or reveal interesting interpretations and/or applications.The major conclusion of the review is that, despite its significant potential, PBPK modelling has not seen the development and implementation it deserves, especially in the drug discovery, research and development processes. The main reason for this is that the successful development and implementation of a PBPK model is seen to require the investment of significant experience, effort, time and resources. Yet, a substantial body of PBPK-related research has been accumulated that can facilitate the PBPK modelling and implementation process. What is probably lagging behind is the expertise component, where the demand for appropriately qualified staff far outreaches availability.

Objective. Atacicept is a recombinant fusion protein that binds and neutralizes B lymphocyte stimulator and a proliferation-inducing ligand. The purpose of this study was to investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of atacicept treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to collect exploratory data on clinical outcomes.Methods. In this multicenter, phase Ib, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial, 73 patients were enrolled into 6 escalating-dose cohorts. Patients received atacicept or placebo as single doses (70, 210, or 630 mg) or as repeated doses given at 2-week intervals (3 doses of 70 mg, 3 doses of 210 mg, or 7 doses of 420 mg), followed by 10 weeks of trial assessments, with a followup assessment at 3 months after the final dose.Results. Atacicept was well tolerated, with few differences between treatment groups and no obvious safety concerns. The pharmacokinetics profile was nonlinear, but was consistent and predictable across all doses and regimens. Treatment-related decreases in immunoglobulin (particularly IgM) and rheumatoid factor levels were evident, and a clear decrease in anti-citrullinated protein antibodies was observed in the cohort that received 7 doses of 420 mg. The B cell response was biphasic, with an initial transient increase (dominated by memory B cells) followed by a doserelated decrease (dominated by mature B cells). Clinical assessments showed trends toward improvement with the 3-month treatment. Little effect on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein levels was seen.Conclusion. Atacicept was well tolerated both systemically and locally. The results demonstrated that the biologic activity of atacicept was consistent with its mechanism of action.

Background Aducanumab is a human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets aggregated forms of Aβ, including soluble oligomers and insoluble fibrils. EMERGE and ENGAGE are two 18‐month, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, global Phase 3 studies with identical design that evaluated the efficacy and safety of aducanumab in patients aged 50–85 years with early Alzheimer’s disease (MCI due to AD or mild AD dementia). Method Key inclusion criteria included positive amyloid PET, MMSE score of 24–30, CDR Global score of 0.5, and an RBANS‐DMI score ≤85. During the 18‐month placebo‐controlled period, patients were randomized 1:1:1 to low‐dose aducanumab, high‐dose aducanumab, or placebo, administered via IV infusion every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint for EMERGE and ENGAGE was change from baseline at Week 78 on the CDR‐SB. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline on MMSE, ADAS‐Cog13, and ADCS‐ADL‐MCI. Result Following pre‐planned futility analysis, analysis of the data from the final database lock showed that EMERGE met its primary endpoint, based on the pre‐specified statistical analysis plan. Patients treated with high dose aducanumab showed a significant reduction of clinical decline from baseline in CDR‐SB scores at 78 weeks (22% versus placebo, P = 0.01). ENGAGE did not meet its primary endpoint. However, data from patients in ENGAGE who achieved sufficient exposure to high dose aducanumab supported the findings of EMERGE. Conclusion EMERGE met its primary endpoint, based on the pre‐specified statistical analysis plan. Data from a subset of patients in ENGAGE support the results of EMERGE. The safety and tolerability profile of aducanumab in EMERGE and ENGAGE was consistent with previous studies of aducanumab.