1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02353864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection

Abstract: In pharmacokinetic data analysis, it is frequently necessary to select the number of exponential terms in a polyexponential expression used to describe the concentration-time relationship. The performance characteristics of several selection criteria, the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), and the Schwarz Criterion (SC), and the F test (alpha = 0.05), were examined using Monte Carlo simulations. In particular, the ability of these criteria to select the correct model, to select a model allowing estimation of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
172
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
172
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where RSS is the sum of squared residuals for the model being tested (Burnham & Anderson, 2004;Ludden, Beal, & Sheiner, 1994). (The full calculation of BIC includes an additional parameter that estimates the population variance from the sample, but this parameter has been subtracted out of the formula used here because, as an added constant, it should be irrelevant to any comparison between different BIC scores based on the same data.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where RSS is the sum of squared residuals for the model being tested (Burnham & Anderson, 2004;Ludden, Beal, & Sheiner, 1994). (The full calculation of BIC includes an additional parameter that estimates the population variance from the sample, but this parameter has been subtracted out of the formula used here because, as an added constant, it should be irrelevant to any comparison between different BIC scores based on the same data.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalized additive modeling (GAM), implemented in the Xpose library of 'R' (ver. 2.11.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria [10]), was used for numerical screening. Only the variables showing a positive result in this screening and having physiological relevance to PK parameters were included in the model and evaluated using LRT.…”
Section: Covariate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two nested models a decrease in 3.84 or 6.63 points in -2LL for an extra parameter was considered significant at the 5 or 1% level, respectively. Since some of the models compared were not nested, -2LL was not used directly for comparative purposes, and the value of the Akaike information criteria (AIC) [22] computed as -2LL ? 2 9 Np, where Np is the number of the parameters in the model, was used instead.…”
Section: Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%