Resumo: O que pode acontecer entre o Teatro e o Ensino de Ciências? Quais as potencialidades da composição Ensino de Ciências com jogos teatrais? Que agenciamentos podem surgir desse encontro? Ao seguir as trilhas da filosofia da diferença em educação, inspirada em Gilles Deleuze, investigase, a partir de uma cartografia, a experiência da oficina de teatro Ciência inCena. Nela, alunos-atores escolheram o conteúdo de peixes a ser trabalhado a partir de jogos teatrais. O processo de montagem de Pedro e o mar ou como os peixes hão de voar indica possibilidades de se pensar outras narrativas para os sujeitos e objetos das aulas de ciências e as relações que os comportam.Palavras-chave: Ensino de ciências. Jogo teatral. Teatro.Abstract: What can happen between Theater and Science Education? What are the potentialities for science teaching and theater games? Which outcomes may emerge from this meeting? By following in the tracks of the philosophy of difference in education, inspired by Gilles Deleuze, the experience of theater workshop Ciência inCena is investigated. In it, student-actors chose the contents to work with in theater games about fish. The process of making the theater play Pedro e o mar ou como os peixes hão de voar indicates possibilities of thinking about other narratives in order to consider the subjects and objects of science classes and the relationships which constitute them.
Resumo A partir de indícios empíricos da produção acadêmica em teoria queer na educação nos últimos 15 anos, este texto explora como os sentidos de queer projetam esperanças sobre o estatuto político da educação e como o evento da teoria queer torna-se a negociação de instâncias que abrem objetos ambivalentes de pesquisas. Argumenta que, por um lado, a articulação para tornar a “teoria queer” passível de incorporação no campo da educação tem funcionado para territorializar seu espectro de ação como sinônimo de pesquisa em gênero e sexualidade. Por outro lado, se tornou possível que gênero e sexualidade fossem incorporados na agenda. A atualização de categorias como “conhecimento” e “ensino” tem tornado o experimento da “teoria queer” refratário às orquestrações normativas da educação. A despeito da defesa de que marcas são abertas e problematizadas, tudo se passa como se só houvesse uma identidade possível para a educação.
This text is a simultaneously personal and political commentary on those who inhabit the border between worlds, such as those now at war in a viral assemblage. Starting from a general intention of shifting curricular responses away from instrumental and technical solutions toward cultivating the ability to act and think in times of uncertainty, the argument developed here is that the need to respond to the Covid-19 crisis involves repositioning curriculum and responsibility as caring for the Earth. The article creates a dialogue between cosmoecological alliances of different onto-epistemological practices and formulations that expand the ethics of care for other-than-humans. The central issue is to defend reimagining the relationship between curriculum and subjectivity within interdependent stories on the planet. We do this in order to develop a sort of vaccine to prevent curricular imagination from becoming captive to the geometric coordinates of the economization of life.
This article explores the overlapping relations between normativity and policies of recognition in curricular discourses from the school experiences of three “gay boys”, named, in this text, as Mitchel, Jonas and Álvaro. Inspired by Judith Butler's work, the argument developed here attempts to displace the critique that describes curriculums as homogenous horizons of normativity and points that schools can contribute to a livable life. On the one hand, the struggle for intelligibility for what counts as a “gay boy” occurs within heterogeneous gender norms, which allow the boys to avoid abjection. As a corollary, these norms displace definitions of homosexuality centered on desire and create new definitions centered on a gender corporality called “gay”. On the other hand, these same corporal forms of circulation of recognition in the curriculum inscribe, through the ambivalence and heterogeneity of normativity, the viability of these school experiences. Therefore, if curriculums are instruments of subjection, they can also function as networks of forces in which intelligibility takes place, contributing to “gay boys” interacting with the historical conditions of the present.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.