Resumo O surgimento da COVID-19 no Brasil explicitou ainda mais a enorme discrepância entre diferentes realidades sociais que coexistem no país, reacendendo as discussões acerca da segurança alimentar e nutricional, à semelhança do que vem acontecendo em outros países que enfrentam a mesma situação de pandemia. Argumenta-se neste trabalho que os riscos para a Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (SAN) e a fome dos brasileiros já vinham se apresentando desde 2016, sendo agora aprofundados pela emergência da epidemia da COVID-19, passando a exigir compreensão da extensão e da magnitude dos problemas e articulação de medidas governamentais nas três esferas de gestão (federal, municipal e estadual), que possam assegurar o acesso à alimentação adequada e saudável, com vistas a reduzir os impactos negativos da doença na condição de alimentação, saúde e nutrição dos mais vulneráveis. Assim, este texto pretende contribuir para o debate sobre as medidas a serem adotadas pelos governos e sociedade para promover e garantir a SAN e impedir que a insegurança e a expansão da fome avancem durante e após a crise social e sanitária gerada pela pandemia.

Food and nutrition are basic requirements for the promotion and protection of health. Nutrition monitoring and dietary recommendations are included in the mission of the Unified Health System (SUS, in its Portuguese acronym), as established by the Organic Health Law no. 8,080 of 1990. This article presents and discusses the food and nutrition agenda of the SUS and its interface with Food and Nutrition Security, its benchmarks, progress and challenges. This essay was guided by biographical and documentary research and, above all, by the experiences and perceptions of the authors, who, at various times and in various contexts, have been and continue to be actors of Brazil's food and nutrition agenda. We emphasise the idea of the SUS, with its accomplishments and shortcomings, as a living system derived from the technical, ethical and political commitments of its administrators, workers, academics and society as a whole. Thus, we seek to contribute to the debate about the Brazilian path to the construction of a public social welfare system committed to health and adequate nutrition as a human rights.

RESUMO Este artigo analisou avanços na redução das desigualdades no Brasil durante o período de 2003 a 2015, para além da perspectiva de renda. Os dados refletem que, embora transformações relevantes tenham ocorrido, mesmo assim, o Brasil persiste como um dos países mais desiguais do mundo. Entretanto, ao colocar uma lupa nos dados de acesso a bens e serviços dos 5% e dos 20% mais pobres disponibilizados pela Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (PNAD), os achados se contrapõem ao lugar comum de que só se promoveu acesso à renda e ao consumo dos mais pobres no período estudado, inexistindo alterações significativas no quadro de acesso a direitos básicos, políticas públicas de educação, saúde e de infraestrutura.

Background Reducing poverty and improving access to health care are two of the most effective actions to decrease maternal mortality, and conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes act on both. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of one of the world’s largest CCT (the Brazilian Bolsa Familia Programme (BFP)) on maternal mortality during a period of 11 years. Methods The study had an ecological longitudinal design and used all 2548 Brazilian municipalities with vital statistics of adequate quality during 2004–2014. BFP municipal coverage was classified into four levels, from low to consolidated, and its duration effects were measured using the average municipal coverage of previous years. We used negative binomial multivariable regression models with fixed-effects specifications, adjusted for all relevant demographic, socioeconomic, and healthcare variables. Results BFP was significantly associated with reductions of maternal mortality proportionally to its levels of coverage and years of implementation, with a rate ratio (RR) reaching 0.88 (95%CI 0.81–0.95), 0.84 (0.75–0.96) and 0.83 (0.71–0.99) for intermediate, high and consolidated BFP coverage over the previous 11 years. The BFP duration effect was stronger among young mothers (RR 0.77; 95%CI 0.67–0.96). BFP was also associated with reductions in the proportion of pregnant women with no prenatal visits (RR 0.73; 95%CI 0.69–0.77), reductions in hospital case-fatality rate for delivery (RR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66–0.94) and increases in the proportion of deliveries in hospital (RR 1.05; 95%CI 1.04–1.07). Conclusion Our findings show that a consolidated and durable CCT coverage could decrease maternal mortality, and these long-term effects are stronger among poor mothers exposed to CCT during their childhood and adolescence, suggesting a CCT inter-generational effect. Sustained CCT coverage could reduce health inequalities and contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goal 3.1, and should be preserved during the current global economic crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic.