Background:The Alzheimer A peptide assembles into multiple small oligomers that are cytotoxic. Results: Increased solvent exposure of hydrophobic residues within non-fibrillar A oligomers of similar size increases cytotoxicity. Conclusion: A non-fibrillar oligomers display size-independent differences in toxicity that are strongly influenced by oligomer conformation. Significance: Identifying the conformational determinants of A-mediated toxicity is critical to understand and treat Alzheimer disease.
To achieve the high protein concentrations required for subcutaneous administration of biologic therapeutics, numerous manufacturing process challenges are often encountered. From an operational perspective, high protein concentrations result in highly viscous solutions, which can cause pressure increases during ultrafiltration. This can also lead to low flux during ultrafiltration and sterile filtration, resulting in long processing times. In addition, there is a greater risk of product loss from the holdup volumes during filtration operations. From a formulation perspective, higher protein concentrations present the risk of higher aggregation rates as the closer proximity of the constituent species results in stronger attractive intermolecular interactions and higher frequency of self-association events. There are also challenges in achieving pH and excipient concentration targets in the ultrafiltration/ diafiltration (UF/DF) step due to volume exclusion and Donnan equilibrium effects, which are exacerbated at higher protein concentrations. This paper highlights strategies to address these challenges, including the use of viscosity-lowering excipients, appropriate selection of UF/DF cassettes with modified membranes and/or improved flow channel design, and increased understanding of pH and excipient behavior during UF/DF. Additional considerations for high-concentration drug substance manufacturing, such as appearance attributes, stability, and freezing and handling are also discussed. These strategies can be employed to overcome the manufacturing process challenges and streamline process development efforts for high-concentration drug substance manufacturing.
Cathepsin D has been identified as a challenge to remove in downstream bioprocessing of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) due to interactions with some mAbs.This study focused on investigating the mechanisms of interaction between cathepsin D and two industrial mAbs using a combined experimental and computational approach. Surface plasmon resonance was used to study the impact of pH and salt concentration on these protein-protein interactions. While salt had a moderate effect on the interactions with one of the mAbs, the other mAb demonstrated highly salt-dependent association behavior. Cathepsin D binding to the mAbs was also seen to be highly pH dependent, with operation at pH 9 resulting in a significant decrease in the binding affinity. Protein-protein docking simulations identified three interaction sites on both mAbs; near the complementarity determining region (CDR), in the hinge, and in the C H 3 domain. In contrast, only one face of cathepsin D was identified to interact with all the three sites on the mAbs. Surface property analysis revealed that the binding regions on the mAbs contained strong hydrophobic clusters and were predominantly negatively charged. In contrast, the binding site on cathepsin D was determined to be highly positively charged and hydrophobic, indicating that these protein-protein interactions were likely due to a combination of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Finally, covalent crosslinking coupled with mass spectrometry was used to validate the docking predictions and to further investigate the regions of interaction involved in mAb-cathepsin D binding. A strong agreement was observed between the two approaches, and the CDR loops were identified to be important for cathepsin D interactions. This study establishes a combined experimental and computational platform that can be used to probe mAb-host cell protein (HCP) interactions of importance in biomanufacturing. K E Y W O R D S cathepsin D, crosslinking, docking, downstream bioprocess, host cell protein, monoclonal antibody, protein-protein interaction, proteomics Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2019;116:1684-1697. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/bit 1684 |
Background Therapeutic protein manufacturing would benefit by having an arsenal of ways to inactivate viruses. There have been many publications on the virus inactivation ability of arginine at pH 4.0, but the mechanism of this inactivation is unknown. This study explored how virus structure and solution conditions enhance virus inactivation by arginine and leads to a better understanding of the mechanism of virus inactivation by arginine. Results Large diameter viruses from the Herpesviridae family (SuHV‐1, HSV‐1) with loosely packed lipids were highly inactivated by arginine, whereas small diameter, enveloped viruses (equine arteritis virus (EAV) and bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV)) with tightly packed lipids were negligibly inactivated by arginine. To increase the inactivation of viruses resistant to arginine, arginine‐derivatives and arginine peptides were tested. Derivates and peptides demonstrated that a greater capacity for clustering and added hydrophobicity enhanced virus inactivation. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) detected increases in virus size after arginine exposure, supporting the mechanism of lipid expansion. Conclusions Arginine most likely interacts with the lipid membrane to cause inactivation. This is shown by larger viruses being more sensitive to inactivation and expansion of the viral size. The enhancement of arginine inactivation when increased hydrophobic molecules are present or arginine is clustered demonstrates a potential mechanism of how arginine interacts with the lipid membrane.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.