In this study, a negative CD-sens to peanut excluded peanut allergy. Both tests, CD-sens to peanut and immunoassay for IgE-antibody to the peanut components, appear to be safe, time saving and cost-effective complements to DBPCFC.

No abstract

No abstract

BackgroundDouble-blind placebo-controlled food challenge, DBPCFC, the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy, is time-consuming and potentially dangerous. A basophil allergen threshold sensitivity test, CD-sens, has shown promising results as a diagnostic tool in food allergy.ObjectivesTo evaluate the reproducibility of oral peanut challenge and compare the outcome to CD-sens in peanut-sensitized children.MethodsTwenty-seven children (4–19 years) underwent a DBPCFC followed by a single-blind oral food-challenge. The peanut challenges (1 mg to 5 g) were evaluated by severity scoring. Blood samples were drawn for CD-sens before the two first challenges.ResultsThirteen children (48%) did not react at any of the challenges. Fourteen reacted at both peanut challenges but not to placebo. Only two of these children reacted at the same threshold dose and with the same severity score. All other children scored differently or reacted at different doses. For children with a positive challenge the geometric mean of the ratio of the doses was 1.834 (p = 0.307) and the arithmetic mean of the difference between the severity scores was 0.143 (p = 0.952). No association was obtained between the two peanut challenges regarding severity score (rs = 0.11, p = 0.71) or threshold dose (rs = 0.35, p = 0.22). Among the children positive in peanut challenge, 12 were positive in CD-sens. Two were low-responders and could not be evaluated. Geometric mean of the ratio of CD-sens values in children with a positive challenge was 1.035 (p = 0.505) but unlike for the severity score and the threshold dose the association between the two CD-sens values was strong (rs = 0.94, P<0.001).ConclusionsFor a positive/negative test the reproducibility is 100% for both peanut challenge and CD-sens. However, a comparison of the degree of allergen threshold sensitivity between the two tests is not possible since the threshold dose and severity scoring is not reproducible.

Diagnosis of peanut allergy has improved thanks to component-resolved diagnostics. Peanut allergen component Ara h 2 is considered to indicate true peanut allergy. The component Ara h 6 is structurally similar to Ara h 2, but the diagnostic value of analyzing IgE antibodies to Ara h 6 is unclear. A boy sensitized (≥0.35 kU_A/l) to Ara h 8 but not to Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 was challenged with peanut and developed grade II anaphylaxis. In serum collected at the time of challenge a doubling of IgE to the peanut allergen extract was observed compared to allergy testing 9 months earlier. In contrast, IgE levels to Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and to Ara h 8 were rather unchanged. After another 2 months, Ara h 6 was analyzed and revealed a level of 24 kU_A/l whilst Ara h 2 was 0.12 kU_A/l. We suggest that IgE sensitization to Ara h 6 caused the reaction and conclude that analyses of IgE levels to peanut and peanut components should be performed in connection with a challenge. Furthermore, levels to Ara h 2 below 0.35 kU_A/l may still indicate a risk of severe reaction at the time of challenge since in rare cases, Ara h 6 IgE antibodies may be present without occurrence of IgE antibodies to Ara h 2.

BackgroundDiagnosing peanut allergy properly is important and can be achieved by combining clinical history with various diagnostic methods such as IgE-antibody (IgE-ab) measurements, skin-prick test, basophil allergen threshold sensitivity (CD-sens) and food challenge. We aimed to evaluate CD-sens to peanut, Ara h 8 and Gly m 4 in relation to an oral peanut challenge in children IgE-sensitized to birch, peanut and Ara h 8 avoiding peanuts.MethodsTwenty children IgE-sensitized to birch pollen and Ara h 8, but not to Ara h 1, Ara h 2 or Ara h 3 were challenged orally with roasted peanuts. Blood samples were drawn for IgE-ab and CD-sens analysis. To measure CD-sens, basophils were stimulated in vitro with decreasing doses of allergens until threshold sensitivity was reached.ResultsAll children passed challenge without objective symptoms, but mild oral allergy syndrome (OAS) symptoms were reported in 6/20 children. Nineteen of twenty children were negative in CD-sens to peanut but 17/20 were positive to rAra h 8. Eleven of twenty children were positive in CD-sens to rGly m 4.ConclusionPositive CD-sens to rAra h 8 show that the Ara h 8 IgE-ab sensitized basophils can be activated by a rAra h 8 allergen and initiate an allergic inflammation despite a negative challenge. Hence, children sensitized to Ara h 8 but not to peanut storage proteins may be at risk for systemic allergic reaction when eating larger amounts of peanuts but most likely don’t have to fear smaller amounts.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12948-014-0007-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

No abstract