No abstract

No abstract

Opiates such as hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, noroxycodone, and oxymorphone reportedly may interfere with the analysis of morphine and codeine. The analysis of these compounds themselves also is an important issue. Thus, double derivatization approaches utilizing methoxyamine and hydroxylamine to first form oxime products with keto-opiates, followed by the derivatization with trimethylsilyl (TMS) or propionyl groups, have been developed for the simultaneous analysis of these compounds. However, these studies have not included all compounds of interest and resulted in inadequate chromatographic resolution or significant intensity cross-contribution between the ions designating the analyte and its deuterated internal standard for certain compounds. By exploring three-step derivatization approaches with the combination of various derivatization groups and orders, this study concluded that application of methoxyimino/propionyl/TMS groups, in the order listed, facilitated the simultaneous analysis of eight opiates (morphine, 6-acetylmorphine, hydromorphone, oxymorphone, codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone and noroxycodone) in urine samples, achieving satisfactory limits of quantitation and detection. In addition, the adapted approach resulted in two usable products for morphine and codeine providing alternatives, should interferences render any of these products non-usable.

Postmortem decay causes fingertip decomposition, desiccation, shriveling, and rigidity, reducing the possibility of obtaining sufficiently clear fingerprints for identification. In this study, five rehydration solutions (ammonium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, potassium hydroxide, urea, and warm water) followed by three fingerprint recording methods (photograph, inking roll, and dusting tape) were investigated to process mummified fingertips from an unidentified cadaver. The results show that sodium carbonate treatment is the most effective for minutiae restoration, followed by ammonium hydroxide treatment. This study also demonstrates that even those fingertips that previously failed in urea solution, 1% potassium hydroxide solution, and warm water treatment could be further improved with sodium carbonate solution to obtain qualified minutiae for fingerprint matching. The optimal procedure is rehydrating the desiccated fingertips with sodium carbonate solution for 24 h followed by dusting the finger and transferring the print to adhesive tape.

No abstract

No abstract

Fingerprints deposited at crime scene can be a source of DNA. Previous reports on the effects of fingerprint enhancement methods have focused mainly on fingermarks deposited in blood or saliva. Here, we evaluate the effects of fingerprint enhancement methods on fingerprints deposited on porous surfaces. We performed real-time quantification and STR typing, the results of which indicated that two methods (iodine fuming and 1,2-indanedione in ethyl acetate enhancement) had no effect on the quantity of DNA isolated and resultant STR alleles when compared to control samples. DNA quantities and allele numbers were lower for samples enhanced with silver nitrate and 1,2-indanedione in acetic acid when compared to control samples. Based on DNA quantity, quality, and observable stochastic effects, our data indicated that iodine fuming and 1,2-indanedione in ethyl acetate were the preferred options for the enhancement of fingerprints on porous surfaces.

In gas chromatography-mass spectrometry methods of analysis adopting the analyte's isotopic analog as the internal standard (IS), the cross-contribution (CC) phenomenon-contribution of IS to the intensities of the ions designating the analyte, and vice versa-has been demonstrated to affect the quantitation data. A novel approach based on the deviations of the empirically observed concentrations of a set of standards was developed to assess the accuracy of the empirically derived CC data. This approach demonstrated that normalization of ion intensities derived from the analyte and the IS generates reliable CC data. It further demonstrated that an ion-pair (designating the analyte and the IS) with ϳ5% or higher CC will result in a very limited linear calibration range. (J