Detection of CEA mRNA expressing cells in peripheral blood 7 days after curative surgery is a novel independent factor predicting recurrence in patients with CRC.

We present the interim results of a postmarketing all-case surveillance study in patients with C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)-positive, relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) treated with the anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab since its 2012 launch in Japan. The safety and efficacy analysis populations comprised 484 and 442 patients, respectively. The ATL subtype was acute in 58.9% and lymphoma in 34.2% of patients. All patients were scheduled to receive intravenous infusions of mogamulizumab (1.0 mg/kg) once weekly for eight weeks, alone or in combination with other modalities. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 74.0% of patients, of which 35.7% were serious and 6.2% were fatal. The priority survey items of infusion-related reaction, skin disorder, infection, immune disorder, and tumor lysis syndrome were reported in 29.3, 34.3, 22.1, 3.5, and 2.5% of patients, respectively. Graft-versus-host disease was reported in 25/42 patients who received mogamulizumab before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The best overall response rate was 57.7% overall, 57.5% in patients treated with mogamulizumab alone, and 58.2% in patients treated with combination therapy. This surveillance indicates that mogamulizumab shows acceptable tolerability in practice; however, because of the risk of serious/fatal ADRs, patients administered mogamulizumab should be carefully monitored.

ObjectiveThis prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab, an anti‐CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody, in patients with CCR4‐positive, relapsed or refractory (r/r) adult T‐cell leukemia‐lymphoma (ATL) in Japan.MethodAll patients were scheduled to receive intravenous infusions of mogamulizumab 1.0 mg/kg once weekly for 8 weeks, alone or in combination with other modalities.ResultsIn the safety analysis population comprising 572 patients, mogamulizumab therapy was started between May 29, 2012, and April 30, 2013, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 73.4% (38.6% serious cases) of patients. The most common ADRs were skin disorders (33.2% [10.8% serious cases]), infusion‐related reactions (30.1% [4.7% serious cases]), and infections (22.0% [14.7% serious cases]). In the effectiveness analysis population comprising 523 patients, the best overall response rate and the response rate at the end of therapy were 57.9% and 42.0%, respectively. The median overall survival was 5.5 months. Safety and effectiveness results were similar between patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.ConclusionThis postmarketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab for the treatment of patients with r/r ATL, including elderly patients, in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND In spite of many reports, it remains unclear whether the presence of tumor cells in circulating blood flow predicts a poor prognosis. METHODS Competitive seminested reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR), a technique for the quantitative detection of tumor cells, was applied to detect the presence of tumor cells in portal and peripheral blood samples from 121 patients with colorectal carcinoma and to clarify their clinical significance. This technique can detect one carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA‐expressing tumor cell in 1 × 105 normal lymphocytes. RESULTS Six of 33 healthy volunteers (18%) demonstrated a positive reaction to this technique. CEA mRNA expression was detected in the portal blood in 51% of patients and in the peripheral blood in 42% of patients. The results from the two blood samples were consistent in 91% of patients. The positive expression rates for portal blood in patients with T1 tumors and those with TNM Stage I disease were 38% and 45%, respectively. The positive rate was significantly higher in patients with colon carcinoma and those with Stage III or IV disease. CEA mRNA expression, quantitatively measured (× 10−8/β‐actin), was 22.9 ± 35.1 in the portal blood and 19.9 ± 40.0 in the peripheral blood, with no statistically significant difference. A significant positive correlation was noted between portal and peripheral CEA mRNA expression levels according to Speaman correlation analysis (correlation coefficient = 0.78; P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the positive rate and level of CEA mRNA expression in the portal and peripheral blood did not appear to be influenced by the established prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The presence of circulating tumor cells might be of less value as a prognostic factor because they also can be detected in patients with early‐stage colorectal carcinoma and appeared to be independent of the conventional prognostic factors. Cancer 2001;92:1251–58. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

The detection of cancer cells in blood taken during surgery is not considered to be a poor-prognostic factor in CRC.