Abstract:We present the interim results of a postmarketing all-case surveillance study in patients with C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)-positive, relapsed or refractory adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) treated with the anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody mogamulizumab since its 2012 launch in Japan. The safety and efficacy analysis populations comprised 484 and 442 patients, respectively. The ATL subtype was acute in 58.9% and lymphoma in 34.2% of patients. All patients were scheduled to receive intravenous infusions of … Show more
“…In fact, we observed that 7 patients died of GVHD among 49 patients who received mogamulizumab before allogeneic HSCT. Our previous result had demonstrated that the rate of grade III‐IV acute GVHD was 28.6% and might be higher compared with that of HSCT not preceded by mogamulizumab, suggesting the risk of severe GVHD is increased by administering mogamulizumab before allogeneic HSCT in patients with ATL . However, it should be paid attention to be led by a small number of patients who have many background factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The safety profile reported in this surveillance study was similar to that reported in our preliminary report and in previous clinical trials . IRRs, skin disorders, and infections which were collected as mandatory items were the most common ADRs, and the frequencies for the first two events were less than those reported in the clinical study of patients with relapsed ATL using the same administration schedule of mogamulizumab as used in this surveillance .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…An exploratory analysis to determine factors inducing skin disorders was performed for various backgrounds, and body mass index, ATL subtype, PS, concomitant use of non‐anticancer products, and the number of mogamulizumab infusion were statistically associated with the incidence of skin disorders (data not shown). However, except for the number of mogamulizumab infusion described in the previous report, the other factors were not reliable predictors of skin disorders. Skin disorders were late‐onset toxicities with a median time to onset of 35.5 days and a maximum time to onset of 230 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As previously reported, due to the nature of surveillance, data collection for safety was considered to be less frequent and response assessment less objective since they were assessed by an attending physician during clinical practice. Additionally, our observation period, at the longest of 31 weeks from the first dosing of mogamulizumab, might not be sufficiently long to evaluate OS and analyze prognostic factors even though the events occurred in 55% of patients during this period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveillance was mandated by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan, and data were collected prospectively from all patients who started mogamulizumab therapy during 1‐year period after the launch. Preliminary safety information from the surveillance has been published in a previous report, and the surveillance was completed in 2018, enrolling more than 500 patients with r/r ATL who were treated with mogamulizumab. Here, we report response rates, survival, and prognostic factors results from the postmarketing surveillance, together with the subset data of elderly patients with ATL in addition to updated safety information.…”
ObjectiveThis prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab, an anti‐CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody, in patients with CCR4‐positive, relapsed or refractory (r/r) adult T‐cell leukemia‐lymphoma (ATL) in Japan.MethodAll patients were scheduled to receive intravenous infusions of mogamulizumab 1.0 mg/kg once weekly for 8 weeks, alone or in combination with other modalities.ResultsIn the safety analysis population comprising 572 patients, mogamulizumab therapy was started between May 29, 2012, and April 30, 2013, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 73.4% (38.6% serious cases) of patients. The most common ADRs were skin disorders (33.2% [10.8% serious cases]), infusion‐related reactions (30.1% [4.7% serious cases]), and infections (22.0% [14.7% serious cases]). In the effectiveness analysis population comprising 523 patients, the best overall response rate and the response rate at the end of therapy were 57.9% and 42.0%, respectively. The median overall survival was 5.5 months. Safety and effectiveness results were similar between patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.ConclusionThis postmarketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab for the treatment of patients with r/r ATL, including elderly patients, in clinical practice.
“…In fact, we observed that 7 patients died of GVHD among 49 patients who received mogamulizumab before allogeneic HSCT. Our previous result had demonstrated that the rate of grade III‐IV acute GVHD was 28.6% and might be higher compared with that of HSCT not preceded by mogamulizumab, suggesting the risk of severe GVHD is increased by administering mogamulizumab before allogeneic HSCT in patients with ATL . However, it should be paid attention to be led by a small number of patients who have many background factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The safety profile reported in this surveillance study was similar to that reported in our preliminary report and in previous clinical trials . IRRs, skin disorders, and infections which were collected as mandatory items were the most common ADRs, and the frequencies for the first two events were less than those reported in the clinical study of patients with relapsed ATL using the same administration schedule of mogamulizumab as used in this surveillance .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…An exploratory analysis to determine factors inducing skin disorders was performed for various backgrounds, and body mass index, ATL subtype, PS, concomitant use of non‐anticancer products, and the number of mogamulizumab infusion were statistically associated with the incidence of skin disorders (data not shown). However, except for the number of mogamulizumab infusion described in the previous report, the other factors were not reliable predictors of skin disorders. Skin disorders were late‐onset toxicities with a median time to onset of 35.5 days and a maximum time to onset of 230 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…As previously reported, due to the nature of surveillance, data collection for safety was considered to be less frequent and response assessment less objective since they were assessed by an attending physician during clinical practice. Additionally, our observation period, at the longest of 31 weeks from the first dosing of mogamulizumab, might not be sufficiently long to evaluate OS and analyze prognostic factors even though the events occurred in 55% of patients during this period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surveillance was mandated by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan, and data were collected prospectively from all patients who started mogamulizumab therapy during 1‐year period after the launch. Preliminary safety information from the surveillance has been published in a previous report, and the surveillance was completed in 2018, enrolling more than 500 patients with r/r ATL who were treated with mogamulizumab. Here, we report response rates, survival, and prognostic factors results from the postmarketing surveillance, together with the subset data of elderly patients with ATL in addition to updated safety information.…”
ObjectiveThis prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab, an anti‐CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody, in patients with CCR4‐positive, relapsed or refractory (r/r) adult T‐cell leukemia‐lymphoma (ATL) in Japan.MethodAll patients were scheduled to receive intravenous infusions of mogamulizumab 1.0 mg/kg once weekly for 8 weeks, alone or in combination with other modalities.ResultsIn the safety analysis population comprising 572 patients, mogamulizumab therapy was started between May 29, 2012, and April 30, 2013, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 73.4% (38.6% serious cases) of patients. The most common ADRs were skin disorders (33.2% [10.8% serious cases]), infusion‐related reactions (30.1% [4.7% serious cases]), and infections (22.0% [14.7% serious cases]). In the effectiveness analysis population comprising 523 patients, the best overall response rate and the response rate at the end of therapy were 57.9% and 42.0%, respectively. The median overall survival was 5.5 months. Safety and effectiveness results were similar between patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.ConclusionThis postmarketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of mogamulizumab for the treatment of patients with r/r ATL, including elderly patients, in clinical practice.
IMPORTANCEMogamulizumab is a monoclonal antibody against CCR4 approved for treatment for mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). Mogamulizumabassociated rash (MAR) is difficult to differentiate from cutaneous MF or SS, which can lead to unnecessary discontinuation of drug use because of concern for severe drug reaction or incorrect presumption of disease relapse or progression in the skin.OBJECTIVE To examine the most common clinical presentations of MAR in patients with MF or SS and the diagnostic and management challenges.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective case series assessed patients from a multidisciplinary cutaneous lymphoma clinic and supportive oncodermatology clinic at a major academic referral center who had a diagnosis of MF or SS and received mogamulizumab from January 1, 2013, to January 1, 2020. Treatment was followed by new or worsening rash with skin biopsy results compatible with drug eruption determined by clinicopathologic correlation and molecular testing to exclude active malignant disease.EXPOSURES At least 1 dose of mogamulizumab.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mogamulizumab-associated rash was characterized by clinical features, including time to onset, clinical presentation, histopathologic features, and management approach.
RESULTSThe study included 19 patients with MF or SS who developed MAR (median age, 65 years; age range, 38-82 years; 10 [52.6%] male). Median time to MAR onset was 119 days (range, 56 days to 3.8 years). Patients with MAR exhibited 4 predominant clinical presentations: (1) folliculotropic MF-like scalp plaques with alopecia, (2) papules and/or plaques, (3) photoaccentuated dermatitis, and (4) morbilliform or erythrodermic dermatitis. The most common anatomical region involved was the head and neck, including the scalp. Histopathologic findings were variable and did not correspond to primary clinical morphologic findings. Immunohistochemistry and T-cell clonality ancillary testing were helpful to distinguish MAR from disease. Most patients with MAR (14 of 19) discontinued mogamulizumab treatment; however, no life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions occurred, and the decision for drug therapy cessation was usually multifactorial. Four patients were treated again with mogamulizumab with no life-threatening drug-related events. Approaches to management of MAR include topical corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, and/or methotrexate.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This case series found that mogamulizumab-associated rash had a heterogeneous clinical presentation with variable and delayed onset in patients with MF or SS. Mogamulizumab-associated rash exhibited a predilection for the head and neck and was difficult to clinically distinguish from relapse or progression of disease. Recognition of the most common clinical presentations can help prevent unnecessary discontinuation of mogamulizumab treatment. The presence of MAR does not necessitate permanent discontinuation of or avoidance of retreatment with mogamulizumab.
Recently, the anti-CCR4 antibody mogamulizumab (Moga, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was approved as a treatment for CCR4-positive adult T-cell leukemialymphoma (ATL) in Japan. We use Moga before or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in patients with aggressive ATL. A recent retrospective analysis using a database from a nationwide survey showed that the use of Moga before allo-HSCT was associated with an increased risk of severe/steroid-refractory acute GVHD and inferior overall survival. Meanwhile, it was reported that a number of patients with chemotherapy-refractory ATL achieved disease control with Moga, including those who subsequently underwent allo-HSCT. To address these issues pertaining to Moga in transplant-eligible patients with ATL, a key opinion leader (KOL) meeting comprising hematologists and transplant physicians was conducted by Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. in Japan. The goal of this KOL meeting was to design a framework to guide decision-making on the use of Moga in transplant-eligible patients with ATL. KOLs first presented their experiences, and after a subsequent discussion, the KOLs agreed on the key scientific statement as summarized in this Expert Commentary. Our experiences suggest that a good number of patients benefited from Moga, achieving disease control that was often unattainable by conventional chemotherapies. However, as our statement is based largely on retrospective studies and real clinical practice, it requires further validation. Nevertheless, we believe that this statement should help efficiently guide decision-making concerning Moga use in transplant-eligible patients with ATL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.