No abstract

Onychomycosis is a common nail disease, responsible for up to 50% of diseases of the nail. The distribution of different pathogens is not uniform; it depends on various factors such as climate, geography and migration. However, studies have revealed that two dermatophytes, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes, account for more than 90% of onychomycoses. Onychomycosis can be divided into four major clinical presentations: distal subungal (the most common form of the disease), proximal subungal (the most common form found in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection), and superficial and total dystrophic onychomycosis. Onychomycosis is a multifactorial disease. Age has a very important effect on the occurrence of onychomycosis, with a correlation between increasing age and infection. Genetics has also been identified as a factor governing the epidemiology of onychomycosis; T. rubrum infection shows a familial pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance. Disease and lifestyle may also play a role in the epidemiology of fungal nail infections. Studies have shown that diabetes, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and peripheral arterial disease may be independent predictors of onychomycosis. Because of the multifactorial nature of the epidemiology, accurate diagnosis, pertinent treatment and patient education must be paramount when treating the disease.

The treatment of onychomycosis has improved in recent years and many patients can now expect a complete and lasting cure. However, for up to 25% of patients, persistent disease remains a problem, thus presenting a particular challenge to the clinician. For these patients, it is obviously important to ensure that a correct diagnosis of onychomycosis has been made, as misdiagnosis will inevitably jeopardize the perception of therapeutic effectiveness. Although onychomycosis accounts for about 50% of all nail diseases seen by physicians, nonfungal causes of similar symptoms include repeated trauma, psoriasis, lichen planus, local tumours vascular disorders and inflammatory diseases. Predisposing factors that contribute to a poor response to topical and/or oral therapy include the presence of a very thick nail, extensive involvement of the entire nail unit, lateral nail disease and yellow spikes. However, poor penetration of systemic agents to the centre of infection, or the inability of topical agents to diffuse between the surface of the nail plate and the active disease below, probably contributes to this. Other factors contributing to recurrence may be related to the patient's family history, occupation, lifestyle or underlying physiology. In addition, patients with concomitant disease (e.g. peripheral vascular disease, diabetes) or patients who are immunosuppressed (e.g. those with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) are more susceptible to onychomycosis. In the elderly, the prevalence of onychomycosis may be as high as 60%, and increases with age; in this population, physical trauma plays a major role in precipitating recurrence, especially in patients with faulty biomechanics due to underlying arthritis and bone abnormalities. It is also possible that recurrence in some cases is due to early termination of treatment or use of an inappropriate dose, and these possibilities should be eliminated before further investigations are undertaken. There is good evidence to suggest that a combination of oral and topical therapies, when given at the same time, yield excellent clinical outcomes, although there remains a need for more effective topical agents with greater nail penetration and more effective oral antifungal agents.

Onychomycosis is a common disorder, but it may not be as common as cited in the literature, because hospital-based studies might overestimate the prevalence of onychomycosis. It is more frequent in males, and toenails are more commonly affected. Dermatophytes, particularly T. rubrum, are the main causative agents.

No abstract

No abstract

In view of recent advances in the development of antifungal agents, this study examined the possible synergy of two new antifungal agents, terbinafine and amorolfine. The study compared two different courses of terbinafine treatment combined with amorolfine 5% solution nail lacquer. Terbinafine was given orally for 6 (AT6 group) or 12 weeks (AT12 group) and amorolfine nail lacquer applied weekly for 15 months. A control group received terbinafine alone for 12 weeks. This was a randomized, prospective, open study of severe dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis with matrix region involvement. Nail samples were taken before the start of the study, at inclusion and at the visits at 6 weeks, 3, 9, 15 and 18 months. To assess the value of such combined therapy we chose an early parameter as the principal outcome variable, which was the result of mycological examination, including direct microscopy and culture, at 3 months (allowing a margin of 15 days). The secondary parameters of success were the mycological results at the later visits, clinical evaluation and a combined mycological-clinical response. Safety and tolerance were also assessed. Adverse events were recorded and liver function tests were performed monthly during the terbinafine treatment. Of the 147 patients included in the trial, 121 attended the 3-month visit, within a time limit of 15 days of 3 months after the beginning of treatment: 40 in the AT6 group, 40 in the AT12 group and 41 in the control group. In all, 32 of 121 patients (26. 4%) had negative mycological results on direct microscopy and culture: 14 of 40 (35.0%) in the AT6 group, 11 of 40 (27.5%) in the AT12 group and seven of 41 (17.1%) in the control group. The cure rate for the global (mycological and clinical cure) response measured at 18 months in 145 patients was 44.0% (22 patients) in the AT6 group, 72.3% (34 patients) in the AT12 group and 37.5% (18 patients) in the terbinafine group. These results suggest that the combination of amorolfine and terbinafine may be of value in the treatment of severe onychomycosis. At the same time a pilot pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed demonstrating a better cost per cure ratio for the patients receiving combination treatment.

The improved effectiveness and economic advantages of combined topical/oral therapies benefit both patients and health providers; these treatment regimens therefore have an important role to play in the modern management of onychomycosis.