The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of different intumescent formulations to flame retard polylactic acid (PLA). First, the ammonium polyphosphate (APP)/pentaerythritol (PER) system is chosen because it previously demonstrated a good behavior for polyethylenic matrices. The PER is then substituted by bioresources such as lignin and starch. The flame retardant properties of the various formulations are evaluated by limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL‐94, and cone calorimetry. Compared to the PLA/APP/PER composite, the materials containing lignin and starch show lower LOI values but still commercially acceptable (superior to 32%). In contrast, the UL ratings obtained for these formulations are superior to that containing PER (V0 against V2 rating). The cone calorimeter analysis confirms the formation of an intumescent structure for the “green” composites, with a final residue corresponding to 50% of the initial sample mass and also a decrease in the peak of heat release of 50%. Finally, the composition of the formulation is optimized following a mixture design methodology to maximize the quantity of bioresources. A 32% LOI value is obtained for a composite containing 60% PLA, 12% APP, and 28% starch. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

No abstract

No abstract

SUMMARYThe study investigates the mechanism of fire retardancy induced by expandable graphite in a polyurethane coating. A complementary investigation to the spectroscopic study performed previously confirms that little interaction occurs between the matrix and the additive. X-ray diffraction study demonstrates that the crystalline structure of the graphite is maintained during the intumescent process. The presence of free radicals in the protective shield is then demonstrated but at low concentration compared with classical intumescent systems, such as for example polyurethane/ammonium polyphosphate. Finally, the physical properties of the char are then investigated. Blowing measurement demonstrates the high degree of expansion of the layer which may partially explain the fire retardant performance of expandable graphite in polyurethane. Surface analyses by optical microscopy and optical profilometry also enable a better understanding of the efficiency of expandable graphite. In the absence of a fire retardant additive the coating displays cracks and holes, providing a pathway for oxygen diffusion as well as heat and mass transfer between the flame and the virgin polymer. Both phenomena are limited when expandable graphite is added to polyurethane. Consequently, fire retardancy of expandable graphite results more from a physical than from a chemical action.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract