Three-dimensional finite element analysis has been applied for determining time-dependent solder joint response of leaded surface mount components under thermal cycling. Two main challenges are the geometric complexity in mesh development and computationally intensive analysis because of the highly nonlinear material properties. Advanced techniques have been applied, including multi-point constraints for mesh transition, which reduces the number of degrees of freedom in the model, and substructuring, which effectively reduces computational time in the iterative analysis. The result is a generic approach for nonlinear creep analysis using commercial FEA software on a high performance workstation. Illustrations are provided for J and gullwing leaded packages.
Actual field conditions that computer components such as microprocessors experience are different from the accelerated thermal cycling tests typically used to perform reliability assessment. Field conditions can include longer dwell times, different temperature ramp rates driven by power ON/OFF events, and temperature fluctuations during the power ON state due to workload patterns. Series of numerical simulations have been performed to study the effect of the field conditions on the solder joint fatigue life of electronic packaging. The simulation results show that SnPb and SnAgCu solders respond differently with respect to dwell time and mini cycles. Without considering the effect of minicycles, it is possible that SnAgCu may fail earlier than SnPb with very long dwell time. However, it is important to note if mini-cycles contribute to damage as seen in this analysis, the SnPb solder will probably still fail before SnAgCu solder.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.