Our data further support the concept of immunoablation and ASCT to re-induce long-term clinical and serologic remissions in refractory SLE patients even in the absence of maintenance therapy. This study also suggests a beneficial effect of ex vivo graft manipulation on prevention of relapses post-transplantation in SLE.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction. Health care workers are at risk of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, many aspects of the professionally conditioned COVID-19 are still poorly understood. The aim of study is to conduct a brief review and analysis of scientific data on the prevalence, features of clinical and laboratory COVID-19 syndromes in medical professionals. To evaluate the structure of post-COVID syndrome in health care workers who are observed in a large multidisciplinary medical organization that has a center for occupational pathology. To present the current state of the problem of examination of the connection of COVID-19 with the profession and admission to work in conditions of high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Materials and methods. At the first stage, a brief review of the literature on the problem of COVID-19 in health care workers was performed, at the second - a single-center observational prospective study of COVID-19 convalescents. The main group consisted of health care workers (n=203), the comparison group - people who do not have occupational health risks (n=156). The groups were comparable in demographic characteristics. The work experience of the medical staff was 15 (5; 21) years. Of the participants in the main group, 20.2% worked in hospitals, and 79.8% in outpatient institutions. Three of the participants (1.5%) were employees of specialized COVID hospitals. Doctors were 25.6%, secondary medical personnel - 51.7%, junior medical and technical personnel - 22.7%. A severe form of COVID-19 was suffered by 25 (12.3%) people, after the artificial ventilation of the lungs (AVL) - two participants. The observation time is 60 days. Statistical analysis included standard methods of descriptive statistics, determination of relationships by the method of logistic regression. The significance level is p<0.05. Results. Most of the known data on COVID-19 in health care workers is obtained in cross-sectional studies. The possibility of occupational infection has been sufficiently proven. The risk probably depends on the work performed and is higher in conditions of direct contact of medical personnel with adults, potentially infected patients, but not in a specialized hospital. It is possible that the course of COVID-19 in health care workers differs from the general population of patients there is evidence of a greater frequency of weakness and myalgia. Studies of the features of post-COVID syndrome in health care workers in available sources could not be identified. According to the results of their own research, health care workers who had experienced COVID-19 had a higher frequency of central thermoregulation disorders, arrhythmias, heart failure, panic attacks and depression. Conclusions. Health care workers are at risk of COVID-19. Professionally conditioned post-COVID syndrome is characterized by the frequency of violations of the central mechanisms of thermoregulation and arrhythmias. COVID-19 in health care workers meets the definition of occupational disease.

The article presents evolutionary changes in occupationally related nonspecific and specific hematologic syndromes, occupational chronic intoxications and blood diseases due to contact with various occupational hazards mostly hematotropic ones, depending on length of service. The presented hematologic characteristics cover specific occupationally related microelement disorders and occupational chronic intoxications during primary diagnosis and in post-contact period. Findings areless occupational chronic chemical intoxications and blood disorders due to hematotropic occupational influences.

No abstract

Aim. To establish symptoms, lung function and to evaluate subsequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during a year after virus-induced COPD exacerbations. Materials and methods. Patients hospitalized with viral (n=60), bacterial (n=60) and viral-bacterial (n=60) COPD exacerbations were enrolled to single-center prospective observational study. COPD was diagnosed according spirography criteria. Viral infection was established in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid or sputum by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for RNA of influenza A and B virus, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and SARS-CoV-2. Symptoms, lung function, COPD exacerbations were assessed. Patients were investigated at the hospitalization onset and then 4 and 52 weeks following the discharge from the hospital. Results. After 52 weeks in viral and viral-bacterial COPD exacerbations groups the rate of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) decline were maximal 71 (68; 73) ml/year and 69 (67; 72) ml/year versus 59 (55; 62) ml/year after bacterial exacerbations. Low levels of diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco/Va) 52.5% (45.1%; 55.8%), 50.2% (44.9%; 56.0%) and 75.3% (72.2%; 80.1%) respectively, of 6-minute walk distance; p0.001 in relation to bacterial exacerbations. In Cox proportional hazards regression analyses viral and viral-bacterial exacerbations were associated with increased risk of subsequent COPD exacerbations by 2.4 times independent of exacerbations rate before index event and FEV1. In linear regression models the relationships between airflow limitation and respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus and influenza virus infection, between low DLco/Va and rhinovirus, influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusion. COPD after virus-induced exacerbations were characterized by progression of airflow limitation, low DLco/Va, low 6-minute walking test distance, subsequent COPD exacerbations risk.