168 children, 14 years of age or younger, were patch tested with the Standard Series of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) over a 5-year period. 77 of the children had 1 or more positive reactions; relevant test results were found in 80% of them. 8 boys and 24 girls were allergic to nickel, which proved to be the most common allergen; 5 boys and 6 girls reacted to chromate, and 5 boys and 4 girls reacted to one or more of the rubber chemicals.

202 patients, 68 males and 134 females, with patch-test-negative, symmetrical vesicular hand eczema were challenged orally in a controlled study with 2.5 mg nickel, 2.5 mg chromium and 1 mg cobalt given as salts of the respective metals. Initially a mixture of the 3 metal salts was given, and if this produced a flare of the eczema, the salts were administered individually at 1 week intervals. 55 patients reacted to the mixture of salts as well as to 1 or 2 of the individual salts. 3 other patients were challenged openly with nickel alone. Male patients reacted primarily to chromate and cobalt, while female patients more commonly reacted to nickel and cobalt. 56 patients were instructed to follow diets planned to reduce the daily intake of the respective metals. The dermatitis of 36 patients cleared or improved markedly after 1 month of dieting. Responses to a questionnaire sent to these 36 patients indicated that 28 of them had followed the prescribed diet rigorously or intermittently for at least a year, because they experienced recurrence of the dermatitis if they stopped dieting. 6 noted no long-term benefit and 2 did not respond.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, oral challenge with balsam of Peru was carried out in 221 patients with various types of dermatitis. 210 patients completed the study, and 45 of them experienced a flare of their symptoms after challenge with balsam of Peru but not after placebo. 15 patients reacted to the placebo, and 5 reacted to both balsam and placebo. Specific reactivity to balsam of Peru was seen particularly in patients with positive patch tests to this compound and in some patch-test-negative patients with vesicular hand eczema, ano-genital and axillary eczema. Dietary restriction of the intake of balsams was followed by marked improvement or clearance of the dermatitis in approximately half of the patients who adhered to the diet for at least 1 month.

64 patients participated in this study. 24 were patients who had positive patch tests to balsam of Peru. The dermatitis of 9 of the patients had flared after open oral challenge with balsam of Peru, and the dermatitis of 31 patients had flared after double-blind oral challenge. All 64 patients were asked to avoid food items suspected of containing balsams for 1 to 2 months. At the end of that time, an evaluation of the diet trial was made; the dermatitis of 37 had cleared or improved markedly. If an improvement had taken place, the patient was asked to continue to diet moderately. 6 months to 3 years after the diet was initiated, a questionnaire was mailed to those patients whose dermatitis had improved after the first trial. The patients were asked to evaluate the long-term benefit of following the diet. 30 felt there was a long-term effect, and 27 still followed the diet instructions to some degree.

Improvement was seen in the dermatitis of 262 of 675 patients who followed a restrictive diet for approximately 1 month. Patients included in the study were sensitive to metal salts, balsams or classical food allergens or reacted to oral challenge with food additives. Also included were patients who did not react to diagnostic tests but who experienced improvement of their dermatitis while maintaining an elimination diet. A follow-up study was carried out 1-3 years after diet treatment was instituted. Each of the 262 patients was asked to complete a questionnaire to describe the long-term course of the dermatitis. 206 responded to the questionnaire, and for 144 of them (70%; 95% confidence limits 64-76%), there was long-term improvement of the dermatitis. Long-term improvement was more common among atopic patients than among non-atopics. Symptoms of contact urticaria were more common among patients with hand eczema than those with other types of eczema.

During a 5-year period, 3664 consecutive patients were patch tested in a private dermatology practice with the Standard Series of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG). 454 of these were tested with one or more additional substances which were suspected of having caused their dermatitis. 194 of the 454 patients had positive reactions to one or more of the additional substances. Most of these reactions were of current relevance, and in only 25% of the patients could the allergies have been predicted by the use of the Standard Series alone. In approximately 50% of the patients, the reactions to additional substances could be traced to occupational sources.

Of 7887 patients with eczema seen in a private dermatological practice over a period of 2 years and 4 months, a specific final diagnosis was found in 5376 (68%), while a final diagnosis of non-specific eczema was made in 2511 cases (32%). The most common final diagnoses were seborrhoeic dermatitis (1351), contact dermatitis (1317), atopic dermatitis (1009) and nummular eczema (822). Battery patch testing was the initial diagnostic procedure performed, and 897 of the 3164 patients who were patch tested had one or more positive patch tests. In 545 cases, the reactions were considered of relevance to the current dermatitis. Tests for immediate-type allergy were carried out in 618 patients, and 284 of these had one or more positive tests. In 86 patients, these test results were of diagnostic significance. 257 patients with positive patch tests were challenged orally with the relevant substance, and 53 of 156 reacted to metal salts, most commonly nickel, while 25 of 101 reacted to orally ingested balsam of Peru. Among patch-test-negative patients, 66 of 408 had positive reactions to one or more metal salts; 41 of 180 reacted to balsam of Peru, while 15 of 41 reacted to various food additives.

No abstract