This qualitative study investigates multi-cases of junior high school English teachers to reveal the dissonances between teachers' beliefs and practices of formative assessment in EFL classes viewed from different Continuing Professional Development (CPD). The Data were collected by conducting semistructured interviews to all respondents, classroom observations and document studies such as journals and lesson plans. The result of this study showed that teachers with high CPD participation level have stronger beliefs in formative assessment compared to those with lower CPD involvement. Their beliefs, however, were not always practiced appropriately in the classroom. Teachers' CPD participation has no real impact on the success of formative assessment practices, although it may influence teachers' beliefs. This is due to some factors influenced the implementation of formative assessment in the classroom. Futhermore, it is expected that teachers carefully consider the influecing factors and carry out formative assessment in accordance with their beliefs.
This study investigated the contribution of word recognition from speech (WRS), syntactic knowledge, metacognitive awareness, self-efficacy to L2 listening comprehension among 92 students in English department, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Indonesia. This study applied Multiple Regression. The instruments consisted of tests and questionnaires. The tests were WRS, Grammaticality judgement and sentence comprehension as two components of proceduralized syntactic knowledge, and L2 listening comprehension test. Questionnaires of metacognitive awareness and self-efficacy in listening were also involved. The results of multiple regression analysis (determination coefficient) showed that word recognition from speech 3000 frequency range, syntactic knowledge (grammar and sentence comprehension test), metacognitive awareness, self-efficacy significantly determined L2 listening comprehension. The scores of word Recognition at the 1000 and 2000 frequency word level gave very little unique predictive to the regression model. This finding suggested that all variables should be promoted in learning process for students' successful L2 listening comprehension.
<p style="text-align:justify">Investigating critical incidents is one way to assist prospective teachers in expressing any developmental stage when accomplishing the teaching practice program. It is a significant component of reflective teaching in an educational framework related to continuing professional development (CPD), particularly self-directed learning. This study aims at exploring EFL prospective teachers’ field experience in cultivating their teaching competence through a critical incident analysis. A qualitative approach was applied. Three participants with different levels of English proficiency took part in this study by sharing their experiences through participating in and answering an interview and an opinionnaire. To analyze the data from the instruments, this study used descriptive analysis and coding techniques respectively. Results indicate that both negative and positive critical incidents contribute to the participants’ teaching development. The incidents support the learning process towards becoming a teacher and assist shaping their awareness of teacher identity. Further, the result of this study reveals that English proficiency level seems to take part in the strategy used for identifying critical incidents. This study implies that critical incidents provide a chance for prospective teachers to be more reflective. Thus, teacher education program stakeholders need to support critical incident analysis by giving relevant assignments while they are doing teaching practice, which in turn builds professional development in the context of prospective teachers.</p>
The study attempts to find out how Indonesian students apply Discourse Markers (DMs) to build coherence in English compositions. It employs a descriptive design, analyzing 52 target DMs and how they are used in 21 argumentative papers. The participants of the study were 21 Master’s students majoring in English Language Teaching (ELT). The results reveal that the participants employ 44 DMs in 234 occurrences, and use some DMs inappropriately in 118 occurrences. The problematic matters cover: non-equivalent exchange, overuse, surface logic, misinterpreted relation, and mistranslation. The study concludes that although the participants have shown their awareness of using DMs to build coherent compositions, there are areas where improvement is needed to increase their ability in using DMs appropriately and effectively to make their writing better and more logically connected. Recommendations to English teachers are also given as pedagogical implications of this study.
To examine bodies of literature from the levels of topics, regions, nations, and journals, a lot of bibliometric studies have been conducted in many fields. However, such studies are a rare undertaking in the field of English language teaching, especially at a journal level. To celebrate the TEFLIN Journal - A publication on the teaching and learning of English’s 30th anniversary, this study exhibits a bibliometric portrait of its publication, indexation, and citation from 1990 to 2019. Two pieces of free software, Publish or Perish and VOSviewer were adopted to conduct the descriptive and network analyses of bibliographic data from Microsoft Academic. In terms of 19 out of 27 metrics in Publish or Perish software, the journal’s publication and citation metrics have risen during its lifetime. The bibliographic network identifies the most productive authors, institutions, and countries along with the co-authorship pattern, type of top-cited articles, and top-used keywords. The article relatedness is also sighted in terms of the citation frequency and number of shared references. Even though the analyses were complicated by some missing articles and improper indexation, this study could still take a full-length bibliometric portrait of the journal during its 30-year journey between the commitment to competence and the quest for higher impact.
Purpose of the study: Investigating the effect of corrective feedback on Indonesian students' writing accuracy was the aim of this present study. Methodology: The methods used were a true experiment with a pretest-treatment-posttest-delayed posttest design was employed to address the research questions and a two-way ANOVA to examine. Main Findings: The data collected was the grammatical accuracy scores from the three groups (comprehensive corrective feedback/CCF, selective corrective feedback/SCF, and non-grammatical feedback/NGF). Applications of this study: Indonesian EFL students’. Novelty/Originality of this study: EFL writing teacher is suggested to accommodate the integrated teaching of grammatical features in a communicative context.
This paper presents a procedure of developing a Speaking syllabus for librarians designed for a blended learning (BL) platform, a combination between face to face and online format. Considering that the syllabus is designed for developing learners' oral competence, the target speaking skill is directed for developing learners' ability to perform effective communication in their workplace and daily lives as well, and so the topics/themes are selected for the librarians' needs. This is in line with life-based learning by using Content Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach. For this purpose, the syllabus development starts with needs analysis, topic selection, and syllabus prototype development, expert evaluation, and revision for final product. The syllabus is structured in such a way that the learning experience is explicitly stated for two formats: classroom face-to face and online to ensure that BL is purposefully planned for instructional activities. The online materials will make learners learn in a flexible time for independent study and for structured assignment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.