No abstract

Purpose: To optimize the implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing method using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Setting: Nagoya Eye Clinic, Nagoya, Japan. Design: Interventional case series. Methods: A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed using the optimal ICL size as a dependent variable and preoperative AS-OCT parameters as explanatory variables for 81 eyes of 41 patients, and the NK-formula version 2 (NK-formula V2) was obtained. Thereafter, 68 eyes of 42 patients were implanted with the ICLs selected as closest to the optimal ICL size calculated by the NK-formula V2. At 3 months postoperatively, the achieved vault was measured by AS-OCT to evaluate the optimization of the sizing method. Results: The anterior chamber width (ACW) and crystalline lens rise were selected as significant parameters for the regression model (R 2 = 0.61, P < .001), as with the previous NK-formula. Of the 68 eyes, 36 patients/62 eyes (91.2%), 5 patients/5 eyes (7.3%), and 1 patient/1 eye (1.5%) were in the moderate, high, and low vault categories, respectively. In the 68 eyes, the vault showed no correlation with the optimal ICL size (R = 0.0185, P = .269), whereas the vault showed a negative correlation with the optimal ICL size in both the 12.6 mm ICL subgroup (R = −0.409, P = .0088) and the 13.2 mm ICL subgroup (R = −0.818, P = .0013). Conclusions: This optimization approach showed excellent ability to select an appropriate ICL to be implanted regardless of the value of other ocular parameters and age, except ACW.

No abstract

The stability of the refractive cylinder after toric pIOL implantation was as high as after LASIK. Although predictability in the LASIK group was higher than in the toric pIOL group in eyes with moderate refractive cylinder, the toric pIOL group had higher predictability than the LASIK group in eyes with high refractive cylinder.

A small toric pIOL rotation occurred during the 6-month follow-up. One cause of rotation could be the intraoperative fixation angle of the toric pIOL. A toric pIOL with a minimum intraoperative fixation angle should be used to prevent postoperative rotation.

Introduction: Although biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) is available, the effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP) correction in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) eyes has not been investigated. Objective: Evaluation of bIOP measurements in eyes with keratoconus and FFK. Methods: Forty-two eyes in 21 patients with keratoconus in one eye and FFK in the fellow eye were examined (KC/FFK group; mean age 24.62 ± 8.6 years; 16 males and 5 females). The control group consisted of 62 eyes in 31 unaffected subjects (mean age 26.26 ± 3.64 years; 15 males and 16 females). The bIOP was determined using a Scheimpflug-based tonometer (Corvis Scheimpflug Technology [Corvis ST®]) after measuring the IOP with a conventional non-contact tonometer (NIOP). The agreement between NIOP and bIOP values was examined using the Bland-Altman plot. The difference between NIOP and bIOP (bIOP correction amount) was compared between keratoconus and FFK eyes. Results: In the control group, there were no significant differences between right and left eyes in both NIOP and bIOP values (p = 0.975 and p = 0.224, respectively). In the KC/FFK group, NIOP values were significantly lower in the keratoconus eyes (9.93 ± 1.96 mm Hg) than in the FFK eyes (12.23 ± 3.03 mm Hg; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in bIOP values between the right and left eyes of the KC/FFK group (p = 0.168). The bIOP correction amount was significantly increased in keratoconus eyes (3.58 ± 2.12 mm Hg) compared to in FFK eyes (1.80 ± 3.32 mm Hg; p = 0.011). Conclusions: For eyes with keratoconus and FFK, the bIOP method is effective to adjust IOP measurements based on corneal biomechanical properties.

To create an equation for predicting the trabecular iris angle (TIA) and to verify its accuracy after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation.

PurposeThis retrospective case-matched study aimed to compare visual and refractive outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and LASIK.Patients and methodsPatients who underwent SMILE (34 eyes of 23 patients) or LASIK (34 eyes of 24 patients) were enrolled and matched according to preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalents. The mean preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent was −4.69±0.6 and −4.67±0.64 D in the SMILE and LASIK groups, respectively. The safety, efficacy, and predictability were compared 3 months after surgery. Changes in corneal refractive power from the center to peripheral points and their maintenance ratios were analyzed and compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the SMILE and LASIK groups, 82.4% and 85.3% of patients, respectively, achieved 20/13 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (p=1.00). There were no eyes that lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity in either group. The maintenance ratios of corneal refractive power changes at the peripheral points in the SMILE group were significantly higher than those in the LASIK group (p<0.05).ConclusionBoth groups achieved similar high efficacy and safety. SMILE surgery resulted in higher refractive power correction in the peripheral cornea than LASIK surgery.