Decalcification of hard tissues has remained an important part in visualizing the histology of the section.For the process of decalcification various decalcifying agents have been used in the past but very limited studies can be found in the literature about the comparison of various decalcifying agents. Aim: Here we present a study comparing three different decalcifying agents (10% Nitric acid, EDTA, 10 % Formic acid). Methodology: 30 freshly extracted premolars were decalcified using three different decalcifying agents.The end point of decalcification was tested by chemical methods. The decalcified sections were routinely processed and staining was done using Hematoxylin and Eosin. Result: Sections decalcified with EDTA gave better results as compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: EDTA is a better option for decalcification of tooth but it has a slow rate of action. So, for the cases requiring urgent results nitric acid can be used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.