2019
DOI: 10.5530/amdhs.2019.2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparision of 10% Nitric Acid, Edta and 10% Formic Acid for Tooth Decalcification

Abstract: Decalcification of hard tissues has remained an important part in visualizing the histology of the section.For the process of decalcification various decalcifying agents have been used in the past but very limited studies can be found in the literature about the comparison of various decalcifying agents. Aim: Here we present a study comparing three different decalcifying agents (10% Nitric acid, EDTA, 10 % Formic acid). Methodology: 30 freshly extracted premolars were decalcified using three different decalcif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study found that the decalcification time of nitric acid was the shortest and EDTA was the longest, in accordance with previous studies. 1 10 11 Because the solubility of calcium phosphate largely depends on solution pH, 12 EDTA with neutral pH takes a longer time compared with acid with a lower pH. Furthermore, EDTA is a chelating agent that gradually captures calcium ions from the superficial surface of apatite crystals and then slowly reduces the size of crystals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study found that the decalcification time of nitric acid was the shortest and EDTA was the longest, in accordance with previous studies. 1 10 11 Because the solubility of calcium phosphate largely depends on solution pH, 12 EDTA with neutral pH takes a longer time compared with acid with a lower pH. Furthermore, EDTA is a chelating agent that gradually captures calcium ions from the superficial surface of apatite crystals and then slowly reduces the size of crystals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The received blocks were sectioned on microtome for 3 µm slices, and the sections were stained with the hematoxylin and eosin method. 11 The stained section was observed under a light microscope by two examiners blinded to the groups, and histological evaluation of each dental tissue including dentin, cementum and dental pulp tissue was graded from 1 to 3 points score based on the criteria shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%