The research concerned here was to know the economic rationality of residents who dwelled again in their former village after the eruption of Mount Merapi in 2010 and refused to be relocated by the government. A combined research method, namely, a combination between a qualitative method and a quantitative one, was used to uncover the rationality. The qualitative part of the research was conducted first by deciding informants considered knowledgeable about the matter under research. Then the informants were interviewed in turns decided via snowball sampling. Some secondary data were used to support the qualitative research. As for the quantitative part of the research, it was conducted afterwards by turning members of the households in the village into respondents. The finding of the research is as follows. The residents perceive the disaster not only as a dangerous natural phenomenon but also as an economic blessing because tourists' visits to the areas suffering from the impact of the disaster enable residents to have activities that have economic value. That economic rationality was what motivated them to return to their village though its condition is categorized by the government as unfit for dwelling.
<p><em>This study aims to desribe rationality of the people who live in eruption-prone areas of Mount Merapi and who refused to be relocated. Qualitative research is for this purpose. Informants were selected by snowball sampling technique. The location of research is in the Pangukrejo village which is a village in the southern slopes of Merapi. The results show that people Merapi as place of origin where they obtain senses of comfort,and safety. Merapi is also place where they acquire and preserve community value system. Merapi is a symbol of their dignity that must be maintained. In this relation eruption is interpreted as destiny eruption interpreted as destiny of God that can not be circumvented. At that time, their living conditions were on the bottom and could be overcome by means of mutual cooperation to return to normal condition. </em>The value rationality motivate them to resettle in their homes after the great eruption of Merapi.</p>
ABSTRAK Eksklusi sosial dan model pemberdayaan peternak merupakan kajian sosiologis pembebasan peternak dari dominasi pemodal besar atau kapitalis. Peternakan khususnya peternak rakyat (unggas) dewasa ini telah mengalami tantangan dan hambatan dalam keberlanjutan usahanya. Hal ini terkait baik suprastruktur dan Infrastruktur pengembangan peternakan yang tidak memihak kepada peternak rakyat. Tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk mengetahui akar masalah penyebab terjadinya eksklusi sosial peternakan rakyat dan dampaknya serta model pemberdayaan bagaimana yang dapat mengatasi marjinalisasi peternak. Studi ini dilakukan dengan metode campuran atau (mix method) meliputi studi kasus, studi dokumentasi dan kajian fenomenologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akar masalah terjadinya marjinalisasi peternak disebabkan oleh adanya regulasi atau aturan yang menyebabkan pihak pemodal melakukan intervensi usaha yang menguasai seluruh sumber modal usaha mulai dari hulu sampai hilir. Solusi pemberdayaan yang relatif mampu mengatasi permasalahan adalah pemberdayaan rekonstruksi komprehensif yang terkait perubahan regulasi dan dan adanya konvensi dalam aspek penyediaan sapronak dan harga produksi.Kata Kunci: Eksklusi sosial; pemberdayaan , rekonstruksi komprehensif ABSTRACT Social exclusion and farmer empowerment models are sociological studies of Breeder's liberation from major financiers or capitalist domination. Farms in particular the people's Farmers (poultry) now have experienced challenges and obstacles in their sustainability efforts. It is related to both the superstructure and infrastructure development of farms that are not favoring to people's farmers. The objective of this study is to know the root cause of social exclusion of people's farms and its impact as well as the empowerment model of how that can overcome the marginalization of breeders. The study was done by mixed method or (mix method) including case studies, documentation studies and phenomenological studies. The results showed that the root cause of the problem of the marginalization the breeder is caused by regulation or rule that causes the financier to intervene business intervention that control the entire source of business capital ranging from upstream to downstream. An empowerment solution that is relatively capable of addressing the problem is a comprehensive reconstruction empowerment related to regulatory changes and the existence of conventions in the aspect of providing Sapronak (production means) and production price.
Purpose: Conflicts between conventional and online transport drivers have been disturbing and cause both physical and psychological casualties. The purpose of this research is to know the processes and factors that cause conflict. Methodology: The research method is qualitative and descriptive. Transporters from Bandung city were accessed and interviewed. They were inquired about their views on the shift of conventional transportation to the online transportation system; later, these interview responses were analyzed to draw inferences. Main Findings: The results of the research show that the process of conflict occurred from the transition of the use of conventional transportation services into online transportation in the city of Bandung. Furthermore, two forms of conflict occurred among transport drivers that are realistic and non-realistic conflicts. The causes of conflict are the seizure of economic resources (passengers), and the trigger factors are lack of communication and coordination among drivers, government delays in making regulations, and no solution to the problems that occur from the management of online transportation. Implications/Applications: These results will be applicable for policy formation as well as removing conflicts between conventional transportation drivers and online transportation actors. Originality/Value: Since: In Indonesia, online transportation has grown since 2015. However, some parties reject the presence of this online transportation, which causes a conflict. This study has thoroughly investigated the conflict between conventional transportation drivers and online transportation and highlighted the factors that cause these conflicts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.