The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the effect of smoking on the outcome of periodontal therapy. The study consisted of 54 patients who participated in a 4-group parallel-arm clinical trial on the efficacy of three locally delivered antimicrobial systems as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in the treatment of sites with persistent pocketing after a course of scaling and root planing. These groups included scaling and root planing either alone (S) (n = 3), or in conjunction with the application of 25% tetracycline fibers (S&T) (n = 13), 2% minocycline gel (S&Mi) (n = 14), or 25% metronidazole gel (S&Me) (n = 14). In each patient four pockets > 5 mm with bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or suppuration were studied. The number of subjects who smoked was: 8 (61.5%) in the S&T group, 8 (57.1%) in the S&Mi group, 6 (42.9%) in the S&Me group, and 6 (46.2%) in the S group. The probing depth, attachment level and other clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks after treatments. The clinical results of this comparative study have been previously reported. Regardless of the type of treatment, the change in the probing depth (delta PD) and attachment gain (delta AL) were greater in non-smoker subjects than smoker subjects. delta PD was 1.14 mm versus 0.76 mm (P = 0.019), and delta AL was 0.52 mm versus 0.50 mm at (P = 0.845) for non-smokers and smokers respectively. The analysis of variance using the general linear model (GLM) was used for delta PD and delta AL and took into account the variations in the treatments, number of smoker subjects per group, and baseline probing depth. There was a significant interaction between the "smoking" and the "baseline PD." Further analysis using linear regression indicated that, while there was a significant relationship between the baseline PD and the delta PD or delta AL among the non-smokers, weak and insignificant relationship existed among the smoker subjects. Thus, smoking may have an important role in determining the prognosis of periodontal treatment, particularly in persistent and deep pockets.
Although all 3 locally applied antimicrobial systems seem to offer some benefit over scaling and root planing alone, a treatment regimen of scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber placement gave the greatest reduction in probing depth over the 6 months after treatment.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 commercially available periodontal systems for local delivery of antibiotics as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in treatment of sites with persistent periodontal lesions following a course of scaling and root planing. Fifty-four patients with 4 pockets > or = 5 mm and bleeding on probing and/or suppuration were randomized in 4 treatment groups including: scaling and root planing plus application of 25% tetracycline fiber (S + Tet) (13 patients), scaling and root planing plus application of 2% minocycline gel (S + Min) (14 patients), scaling and root planing plus application of 25% metronidazole gel (S + Met) (14 patients), and scaling and root planing alone (S) (13 patients). Clinical measurements were taken at baseline and 6 weeks after the end of treatment periods. All treatments were applied using the distributors' recommended protocols and resulted in significant improvement in probing depth, attachment level, bleeding on probing and the modified gingival index (MGI) scores. The improvements in clinical parameters were greater in all three adjunctive treatment groups than scaling and root planing alone. The mean probing depth reductions were: S + Tet = 1.35 mm, S + Met = 0.95 mm, S + Min = 0.87 mm and S = 0.60 mm. The probing depth reduction was significantly greater in the scaling plus tetracycline fiber group than the scaling and root planing alone group (P = 0.002). The difference between groups in improvement of attachment level or bleeding on probing was not significant Scaling plus tetracycline fiber treatment resulted in the greatest reduction in the MGI scores which was significantly greater than all other groups. While the frequency of sites with suppuration was markedly reduced following all treatments, it reached zero in the scaling plus tetracycline fiber group. No serious adverse effects were observed or reported for any treatment. While all three locally applied antimicrobial systems seem to offer some benefit over scaling and root planing alone, a treatment regimen of scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber replacement gave the greatest advantage in the treatment of persistent periodontal lesions at least during the 6-week period following treatment.
These findings call into question the value of performing repeated subgingival scaling at 3-month intervals for patients with persistent disease.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Nd:YAG laser treatment on subgingival calculus, cementum and dentine, in vitro at different power settings and durations. The study included 2 experiments. In the 1st experiment, 32 extracted teeth with calculus were divided into 8 laser treatment groups. Each tooth was treated on 2, 3 or 4 sites. In the 2nd experiment. 3 extracted cementum covered teeth and 3 extracted root planed teeth with exposed dentine were selected. 1 surface of each tooth was subjected to 8 different laser treatments. In both experiments, all specimens were assessed using scanning electron microscopy. Micrographs were taken from each treated site at X100 and X750 magnifications. An arbitrary scale (from 0 to 3) was used to score the degree of damage caused by the laser. Generally, the laser caused greater damage on calculus than either cementum or dentine. Linear regression analysis showed that higher total energy input caused a greater mean damage score on calculus (R2= 66%, p<0.001). 3‐way analysis of variance showed that for calculus, the power setting, number of pulses per second and the duration of exposure contributed independently to the mean damage score in an additive way. Cementum specimens were not affected by treatment 1 (50 mJ. 10 pps, 1 s). treatment 2 (50 mJ, 10 pps, 5 s), and treatment 5 (50 mJ, 20 pps, 1 s). Dentine specimens were not affected by treatment 1 (50 mJ, 10 pps, 1 s). The results also showed that there was variability in susceptibility of different teeth and different parts of each tooth which was true for calculus, cementum and dentine.
Background: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of applying Bio-OssÒ, an anorganic bovine bone xenograft (control group) to the combined use of Bio-OssÒ and Bio-GideÒ (a bioabsorbable collagen membrane) (test group) in human mandibular Class II furcation defects. Methods: A total of 18 furcations (8 tests and 10 controls) in 14 patients suffering from chronic periodontitis were treated in this randomized clinical trial. Open vertical and horizontal furcation depths (OVFD and OHFD), vertical and horizontal clinical attachment levels (VCAL, HCAL), probing depth (PD) and free gingival marginal level (GML) were among the clinical parameters measured prior and six months after treatment, at re-entry surgery. The data were analysed by statistical tests while a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: At the surgical re-entry, the mean reduction for OVFD of the control and test groups was 1.9 ± 1.3 and 2.1 ± 1.0, and for OHFD 2.1 ± 0.7 and 2.4 ± 1.3, respectively. The control and test treatments resulted in significant reductions in PD, VCAL and HCAL measurements at re-entry but there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments in all soft and hard tissues measurements. Conclusions: This clinical trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of the combined use of Bio-GideÒ and Bio-OssÒ to the use of Bio-OssÒ alone, although both therapies resulted in significant gains in attachment level and bone fill.
Recent investigations imply that a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease may be the ability of oral microorganisms to induce production and/or activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the host tissues. It has been suggested that the pharmacologic inhibition of MMP activity could play an important role in achieving a desirable outcome in periodontal therapy. The efficacy of locally delivered antibiotics on the level of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) stromelysin (SL) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) on sites with a history of a poor response to mechanical treatment was studied. Fifty-two patients with 4 periodontal pockets > or = 5 mm and bleeding on probing were randomized into four groups of 13 patients. One group received scaling and root planing alone and the other three groups received scaling and root planing plus a locally delivered antimicrobial system. These included 25% tetracycline fiber, 2% minocycline gel, and 25% metronidazole gel. The GCF samples taken at baseline and 6 weeks after treatments were analyzed using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). GCF SL levels significantly decreased after adjunctive tetracycline fiber (paired t-test, P = 0.020) and minocycline gel (paired t-test, P = 0.023) treatments whereas it remained almost unchanged in the other two groups. While the GCF TIMP level did not change significantly in the scaling and root planing alone group, it significantly increased for all three adjunctive antimicrobial treatments (for tetracycline fiber P < 0.001, minocycline gel P = 0.005, metronidazole gel P < 0.001). The use of adjunctive locally delivered antimicrobial systems, particularly the tetracycline family, may offer an advantage in changing the metalloproteinase profile of the GCF to one more compatible with periodontal health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.