The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 3 commercially available periodontal systems for local delivery of antibiotics as adjuncts to scaling and root planing in treatment of sites with persistent periodontal lesions following a course of scaling and root planing. Fifty-four patients with 4 pockets > or = 5 mm and bleeding on probing and/or suppuration were randomized in 4 treatment groups including: scaling and root planing plus application of 25% tetracycline fiber (S + Tet) (13 patients), scaling and root planing plus application of 2% minocycline gel (S + Min) (14 patients), scaling and root planing plus application of 25% metronidazole gel (S + Met) (14 patients), and scaling and root planing alone (S) (13 patients). Clinical measurements were taken at baseline and 6 weeks after the end of treatment periods. All treatments were applied using the distributors' recommended protocols and resulted in significant improvement in probing depth, attachment level, bleeding on probing and the modified gingival index (MGI) scores. The improvements in clinical parameters were greater in all three adjunctive treatment groups than scaling and root planing alone. The mean probing depth reductions were: S + Tet = 1.35 mm, S + Met = 0.95 mm, S + Min = 0.87 mm and S = 0.60 mm. The probing depth reduction was significantly greater in the scaling plus tetracycline fiber group than the scaling and root planing alone group (P = 0.002). The difference between groups in improvement of attachment level or bleeding on probing was not significant Scaling plus tetracycline fiber treatment resulted in the greatest reduction in the MGI scores which was significantly greater than all other groups. While the frequency of sites with suppuration was markedly reduced following all treatments, it reached zero in the scaling plus tetracycline fiber group. No serious adverse effects were observed or reported for any treatment. While all three locally applied antimicrobial systems seem to offer some benefit over scaling and root planing alone, a treatment regimen of scaling and root planing plus tetracycline fiber replacement gave the greatest advantage in the treatment of persistent periodontal lesions at least during the 6-week period following treatment.
Recent investigations imply that a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease may be the ability of oral microorganisms to induce production and/or activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the host tissues. It has been suggested that the pharmacologic inhibition of MMP activity could play an important role in achieving a desirable outcome in periodontal therapy. The efficacy of locally delivered antibiotics on the level of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) stromelysin (SL) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) on sites with a history of a poor response to mechanical treatment was studied. Fifty-two patients with 4 periodontal pockets > or = 5 mm and bleeding on probing were randomized into four groups of 13 patients. One group received scaling and root planing alone and the other three groups received scaling and root planing plus a locally delivered antimicrobial system. These included 25% tetracycline fiber, 2% minocycline gel, and 25% metronidazole gel. The GCF samples taken at baseline and 6 weeks after treatments were analyzed using an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). GCF SL levels significantly decreased after adjunctive tetracycline fiber (paired t-test, P = 0.020) and minocycline gel (paired t-test, P = 0.023) treatments whereas it remained almost unchanged in the other two groups. While the GCF TIMP level did not change significantly in the scaling and root planing alone group, it significantly increased for all three adjunctive antimicrobial treatments (for tetracycline fiber P < 0.001, minocycline gel P = 0.005, metronidazole gel P < 0.001). The use of adjunctive locally delivered antimicrobial systems, particularly the tetracycline family, may offer an advantage in changing the metalloproteinase profile of the GCF to one more compatible with periodontal health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.